Assessment of CMS Compare Site Project

Assessment of CMS Compare Site Project

Instructions/Descriptions

Assessment of CMS Compare Site Project

[Order Now]

Instructions

Week 6 Mini Assessment: CMS Compare Site: Metrics from a Consumer’s View Formatting: APA 7th Edition APA Formatted Cover Page Downloaded CMS Comparison (PDF) APA Formatted Essay on CMS Compare Site APA Reference Page: (You do not need to cite the CMS Compare Site. If using other references, please include them on the reference page. Remember, every reference must have a correlating in-text citation.)

Instructions: Background: Many healthcare consumers research providers, facilities, hospital, and practices prior to obtaining care or healthcare services. CMS regulates many healthcare industries, making publicly recorded data available to people based on specific measures and metrics.

This week we learned about different measures, metrics, and performance improvement considerations, while a manager needs to understand these concepts and be able to deliver on these specific elements, the manager should also understand how consumers may utilize these metrics from a consumption standpoint and consumers’ view. Understanding how a consumer selects their care, influences your operations, revenue, and potential overall potential.

Additionally, understanding the CMS comparison sites allows you to review your competition and determine the different areas that your organization may need to improve upon, build upon, or showcase. While there are many sources of data, one of the most common forms that consumers use to evaluate the care delivery options is through the use of CMS, as there is different information that is provided from a public perspective.

Short Essay: Using the CMS Compare Site, provided in the links below, select an industry of interest and search three facilities or practices in your area. Once you have selected your three facilities, providers, or practices, within your industry of interest, then download your report from the CMS Compare Site.

(Note: You may need to select the Print option on your website browser and save the comparison information from CMS as a PDF in order to be able to upload your comparison to the assignment dropbox. You can also provide a screenshot, if you are unable to download the comparison report of your selected healthcare entities.)

[Order Now]

Provide a two to three paragraph description about your experience using this site and how this site may be helpful from a consumers’ perspective. Please remember to include the industry you selected and identify the three facilities, practices, hospitals, or services that you selected for comparison in your submission with your city and state being provided. CMS Compare Site: https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/ CMS Information on Quality Programming: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives- Patient-Assessment-Instruments/MMS/Quality-Programs

https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/

https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/MMS/Quality-Programs

https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/MMS/Quality-Programs

Mini Assessment: CMS Compare Site

Assessment of CMS Compare Site Project

RUBRIC Excellent Quality 95-100%   Introduction 45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Literature Support 91-84  points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Methodology 58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. Average Score 50-85% 40-38 points More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. 83-76  points There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. 52-49  points The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Poor Quality 0-45% 37-1 points The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. 75-1 points There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. 48-1 points There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Assessment of CMS Compare Site Project Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

Assessment of CMS Compare Site Project

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!