Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Writing Guide to The Gateless Gate (Mumonkan)
*The report is due on December 1. It is to be handed in as a printed hard copy in class. The paper should be about 5 pages in length (roughly 1,500 words), typed with double-spacing.
*Using at least TEN cases of the gong’an/koan collected in The Gateless Gate, address the following questions of religiosity. The individual gong’an/koan do not cover all these issues. Your goal is to assemble enough of them to tackle the issues at hand.
What is ultimate reality? What is the nature of ultimate reality? What is absolute truth? What are the sources of the divine? What are the notions of Buddhahood?
What is the relationship between humanity and ultimate reality?
What is the role of an individual? What are the ethical and moral obligations of a human being, inspired by the understanding of the divine/absolute truth?
What are the roles, if any, of the community/sangha?
How is the ultimate realized? How does one pursue spiritual cultivation?
What is the role of the mind or no-mind? What is the role of rational thought? How is rationale thought reconciled with irrational thought? What is the role of language?
What is the relationship between the master and the disciple?
What is the role of the physical world and natural environment in evoking religious sensibilities and beliefs? How do aspects of nature represent the sacred?
*Be sure to denote and specify the cases that you are using. The cases are numbered. Also, if you are quoting the text, be sure to include the page number.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/