Article summary and critique

December 21, 2022

Article summary and critique

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Article summary and critique

[Order Now]

Article Summary and Critique

The purpose of an article review is to communicate the main points of a study and to summarize the key points, discuss the implications of the article for multicultural counsellors, and critique the content, methodology, and writing style used in the study by highlighting both the strengths and the possible weaknesses demonstrated in the article.

The review is not meant to re-iterate the details of the study nor to paraphrase each point; instead, it should summarize and discuss the study. Quotes should be used sparingly or not at all. You may format your written assignment either as a bulleted list, or as a traditional essay paper. The written document should consist of approximately 3 double-spaced pages, or approximately 750 words (± 50 words), excluding the cover page and the reference list. For your article summary and critique assignment, select any one of the following articles:

Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Owen, J., Worthington E. L. Jr., &Utsey, S. O. (2013). Cultural humility: Measuring openness to culturally diverse clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 353-366.

APA 6th edition

Summarize the key points made in one of the articles listed. (20% of the assignment mark)
Discuss the implications of the article for multicultural counsellors. (30% of the assignment mark)
Critique the content, methodology, and writing style used in this study by highlighting both the strengths and the possible weaknesses demonstrated in the article. (35% of the mark)
1. For your critique of the study, draw inspiration from Checklist for Critiquing Research Articles
2. Depending on the article you choose to critique, not all of the points entered on that checklist will apply. You must be selective and prioritize: address only the most salient strengths and limitations.
Ensure your work:
1. contains no grammar or spelling errors;
2. conforms to APA style (or bulleted lists, tables, or charts were attractively formatted);
3. is written clearly and concisely; and
4. is received by the deadline. (15% of the assignment mark)

[Order Now]

Article summary and critique

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.