Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
ART1310 Tolstoy Discussion Post
Carefully reading the instructions and the rubric located on pages 2 and 3
Format
Introduction In Chapter 1 part 2, we read excerpts from Tolstoy’s “What is Art”. You also watched videos that related to the value, whether monetary, emotional, or in terms of artistic innovations that people place on art.
Tolstoy writes how reading a book, looking at a painting or sculpture, watching a play, dance or a musical performance, or experiencing other kinds of art can infect you with feelings, such as (but not limited to)
Content
Tolstoy rubric original posts | |||||
Mastery | Advanced | Proficient | Beginner | Left the room | |
Content – | Student responds thoughtfully and thoroughly to the prompts, in a heartfelt manner, with plenty of descriptive details 10 points | Student responds to all prompts, and includes descriptive details
8 points |
Student responds to the prompts but could use more descriptive details
points 6 points |
Student attempts to respond to the prompt but is unclear at times, and lacking in full details
4 points |
Student makes little attempt to respond to the prompts
0 |
Mechanics | Student writes in narrative style, with proper spelling, grammar, sentence structure, capitalization, no unnecessary abbreviations, with less than two typos; Clear evidence of proofreading
10 points |
Student writes in narrative style, with proper spelling, grammar, sentence structure, capitalization when required, no unnecessary abbreviation, but may have 3-4 typos. Evidence of proofreading.
8 points |
Student writes in narrative style, with 5 – 7 typos, relating to spelling, grammar, sentence structure, proper capitalization, and/ or unnecessary abbreviation. If proofread seems rushed.
6 points |
Student answers questions as a list OR has 8 – 10 typos (spelling, grammar, sentence structure, proper capitalization, and/ or unnecessary abbreviation. Little evidence of proofreading.
4 points |
Pervasive typos (11 or more) including spelling, grammar, sentence structure, proper capitalization, and/ or unnecessary abbreviation.
No evidence of proofreading 0 points |
Readability | The writing is clear, well organized, logical and crafted
10 points |
The writing is well organized, logical and clear.
8.5 points |
Writing basic, organized, mostly logical, but takes 2nd reading to grasp its meaning.
7 points |
Writing basic, jumps from point to point, not always logical, takes more than 2 readings to understand.
5.5 points |
The writing is difficult to follow, unclear, and disorganized.
0 points |
Directions | Follows format instructions;
Submits on time; to proper discussion board; meets required word count 5 pts. |
Overlooked 1-2 formatting requirements; submits on time; & to the proper discussion board; meets required word count 4 pts | Overlooked 3- 4 formatting requirements, submitted on time; to proper discussion board; meets word count 3 pts | Overlooked 3-4 formatting requirements; has submitted a day late, meets required word count. 2 pts | Overlooked 5 or more formatting requirements; more than day late, less than required word count. 1- 0 points |
*Students who do not achieve the minimal word count (300 words) will have points deducted off the top, based on the % of total words submitted. For example, if a student submits a 200-word autobiography, they will have 33% of the base grade of 50 deducted before any other deductions are calculated into the total grade. 33% of 50 is 16.5 points.
Rubric for Individual Responses on the Next page
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/