Application of Qualitative Descriptive Design

December 6, 2022

Application of Qualitative Descriptive Design

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Application of Qualitative Descriptive Design

[Order Now]

Directions

Using the information from the submitted Topic 3 assignment, “Application of Qualitative Descriptive Design,” and your submitted Topic 5 assignment, “Application of Case Study Design,” enter the revised components into the respective columns in the “Contrast Table.” Be sure you are entering information that has been revised based on the instructor feedback from your original submissions.

Write a reflection (250-300 words) that provides a bulleted list of the changes you made to the paper and discusses your revision process including how you incorporated the instructor’s feedback into the revised version. Similar to an abstract, this section will receive its own page following the title page and preceding the introduction to the paper.

Consider the possibility of conducting your proposed dissertation research study (Mindfulness Training in Elite Golfers) using a phenomenology design. Enter the components into the Phenomenology column in the “Contrast Table.”

In 1,250-1,500 words, contrast the use of qualitative descriptive, case study, and phenomenology designs for your proposed dissertation research. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each design relative to your study? Enter your response in the space provided in the “Contrast Table” resource.

Part 1

Directions: Complete the table below and the subsequent contrast statement for your proposed study. You should include information from your Topic 3 and Topic 5 assignments that has been revised based on instructor feedback.

Component	Qualitative Descriptive (Revised based on Instructor Feedback)	Case Study (Revised based on Instructor Feedback)	Phenomenology
Problem Statement
Purpose Statement
Research Questions (At Least Two)
Analysis of the Feasibility of Conducting the Study
Analysis of the Alignment of the Study Components
Analysis of the Fit of This Design to the Proposed Problem Statement, Purpose Statement, and Research Questions	At least 1 Reference and in text citation	At least 1 reference and in text citation	At least 1 reference and in text citation

[Order Now]

Part 2

Contrast of Study Designs

Directions: In 1,250-1,500 words, contrast qualitative descriptive, case study, and phenomenology designs considering your proposed dissertation research. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each design relative to your study?

Please use at least 5 APA references and in text citations

Application of Qualitative Descriptive Design

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.