application log: Cognitive Dissonance Theory

December 22, 2022

application log: Cognitive Dissonance Theory

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

application log: Cognitive Dissonance Theory

[Order Now]

Description

General Writing Guidelines

You’re required to write an application log that should be a 3-page, double-spaced essay that applies a theory (e.g., Constructivism, AAT, or Planning theory) you have learned in this class to your own life. In the application log, be sure to identify explicitly which theory you’re applying. Describe the ideas or concepts from the theory that you think apply particularly well to the personal experience you selected, and explain how. You can write about how the theory gives you a better understanding of communication or the suggestions the theory offers for improving your future communication practices in similar situations. You may also discuss any limitations with the theory, especially in terms of its lack of ability to explain the instance you described in the log.

Sample application logs are available on Canvas.

General Criteria for Grading

How well you have clearly identified the theory or theoretical concepts you’re applying.

Make sure your essay shows your understanding of the material.

Try to explain the theory and relevant concepts in your own words.

How well you have applied the theory to your experience.

Your application should show logical clarity and consistency.

The overall quality of writing exhibited in the essay.

To receive a high grade on your log, your essay should have very few (no more than 3) or no misspellings, sentence fragments, wrong word choices, grammatical mistakes, or formatting errors.

application log: Cognitive Dissonance Theory

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.