Anomaly Assessment Book Report Assignment

December 17, 2022

Anomaly Assessment Book Report Assignment
Description
Read Georgia part one: from Book1 to book 3 chapter 3 (They are all in one textbook) (Attached).
I also attached the book of Human Rights you need to Link anomaly to a philosophical principle.
Professor instructions:
Critical Plot Summaries
To do a critical plot summary first determine from the syllabus the number of chapters you have assigned for each class. Then summarize what has happened in the plot for each chapter separatelyfor example for chapter one say what happened in chapter one. If you have an assignment of five chapters (for example):
Chapter One
Give a summary of the plot (around 100-150 words)
Chapter Two
Give a summary of the plot (around 100-150 words)
Chapter Three
Give a summary of the plot (around 100-150 words)
Chapter Four
Give a summary of the plot (around 100-150 words)
Chapter Five
Give a summary of the plot (around 100-150 words)
Anomaly: pick out something unconventional and surprising that happened during all the chapters readOne Anomaly.
Link anomaly to a philosophical principle from the Human Right book (Attached).
Requirements: 100-150 words for each chapter

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.