Annotated Bibliography on Health Promotion

December 9, 2022

Annotated Bibliography on Health Promotion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Annotated Bibliography on Health Promotion

[Order Now]

Writing to Inform: Literature Review Assignment

Grading: Total Points = 100 points

Part A: 60 points – Annotated Bib
Part B: 30 points literature matrices
APA/Grammar Writing Mechanics = 10 points

Overview: In order to complete your DEP assignment, you will need to do research. One of the more useful tools in conducting research is the annotated bibliograph and literature review matrix. An annotated bibliography combines the citations found in the References list at the end of documents in APA format with annotations about each of the sources.

Purpose: An annotated bibliography is an organizing tool that is helpful when working on a research project. An effective annotated bibliography is used to compile research sources in one location and provide the researcher with quick access to the information contained in each source. A literature review matrix better consolidates, facilitating the writing of the literature review section.

Assignment Guidelines:

Step 1: Identifying and Reading articles

Identify 3 peer-reviewed articles. No older than 5 years (2016 and above https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMKZ3cBoHy0

Article 1: Find one articles that discuss your selected health topic – define the topic, provide risk factors, justify why it is an important public health issue, research etc.
Article 2: Find one articles that discuss evidence-based prevention/management strategies tackling your health issue using
Health policy/environmental change/communication
Article 3: Find one articles that discuss specific interventions that have been implemented to tackle your health issue (and population of interest)
Local/ state/national level –

Step 2: Annotating and Reviewing (100 points)

You will submit two components
Part A: Annotated Bibliography (60 points)
Part B: Literature Review Methodology & Matrix (30 points)
APA formatting, correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling must be used (10 points)

*See next page for directions on each of these components

Part A: Annotated Bibliography Guidelines

Write an annotated entry for each article
Cite the source in proper APA format and organize entries in alphabetical order by author
Copy and paste abstract of article
Write a thoughtful and complete annotations (minimum 120 words PER article entry) in your own words, that includes a:
Brief annotation that summarizes the article (approx. 3-5 sentences).
Then in 2 to 3 sentences, explain the source’s relevance and importance to your issue or health promotion at large.

*See example on D2L.

[Order Now]

Part B: Literature Review Matrix Guidelines

For all 3 articles, read and input information into the literature review matrix
The goal is to write “summary short sentences” based on the article. These tables will help you and your group members in the actual writing of your Paper Part 2 allowing you to quickly pull the main ideas/themes from each article.
Cite the source in proper APA format and organize entries by article set
Provide a Literature Review Methodology Section as well

Annotated Bibliography on Health Promotion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.