Order Number |
213545678901 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Your paper should be divided into 4 sections
Section 1
[Order Now]
Raise a question about how humans should treat a specific group of animals in a specific situation.
To answer this question, connect the question to one of the four core concepts we’ve discussed this semester: rights, well-being, personhood, or autonomy. Depending on the answer to your question, what might that reveal about one of these concepts?
The answers could be “yes, always” and “no, never” if, for instance, you question is something like, “Is it ethical to own tigers as pets?” But you might want to focus on more nuanced answers, such as, “only if you’re a highly trained individual” or “never unless there is no other option for the animal.”
For each answer, provide one reason in support of that answer being true. Discuss the core concepts and other relevant philosophical terms were helpful.
For example, with the “Is it ethical to own tigers at pets?” question, if your answers are “yes” and “no”, you could discuss why maybe the answer is “yes” if it’s important to not restrict individual people’s rights, maybe the answer is “no” if it’s important to protect the well-being of tigers, and the safety of humans.
In this section, you are essentially debating yourself. If you provide plausible, compelling reasons for both answers, and I cannot tell which answer you actually favor, then you have done a good job in this section.
Explain the author’s reasoning for their answer, using evidence from the text.
To do this, you need to explain how their answer to this specific question fits in with their overall account or theory regarding animal ethics, which you will need to summarize and cite.
Section 4
Choose one of the answers to your main question and discuss one interesting or important ethical implication that would result, if that answer is true.
This means you have to take one of the answers and logically follow where it goes. For example, if you choose the answer that it is unethical to own tigers as pets because they are too dangerous to be around human communities, you could discuss whether that principle extends to a hermit living on their own, far away from other people.
Or you could instead discuss how dangerous is too dangerous when it comes to other pets. Or you could discuss whether this danger principle applies to other activities, like sky diving, drag racing, or playing with fireworks.