Angry Adolescence Case Analysis Paper

December 7, 2022

Angry Adolescence Case Analysis Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Angry Adolescence Case Analysis Paper

[Order Now]

The case study selected for the discussion included an adolescent female who appears to be extremely upset. The first video presented the client exhibiting extreme anger. The client as observed in the first video, appeared to be highly disrespectful towards the therapist and refuses to discuss anything.

The client was also observed to have misbehaved with the therapist. In the second video, it was observed that the therapist succeeded to initiate a productive discussion with the client, which revealed significant points regarding the personality of the client.

The client was identified to be a popular girl at her school; however, she reported having anger-related issues. The client’s behavior indicated that she is most likely to be suffering from oppositional defiant disorder (ODD).

The ODD is a form of disruptive behavior disorder in which the client experiences irritable or angry mood, vindictiveness, and disobedient behavior (Cavanagh, et al., 2017). Clients experiencing ODD finds it difficult to keep their anger under control and exhibits a rebellious and noncompliant behavior (Cavanagh, et al., 2017).

DSM-5 Criteria

The DSM-5 criteria for the diagnosis of ODD require that the client experience a pattern of irritable mood or anger, aggressive or rebellious behavior, or vindictiveness for a minimum duration of six months (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). According to the American Psychiatric Association (2013), the DSM-5 criteria for ODD requires that the client must exhibit a minimum of four of the following symptoms:

Frequent loss of temper
Frequent anger and resentment
Frequently irritable or get annoyed easily
Frequent arguments with authoritative figures
Frequent denial to follow orders
Frequently upsets others
Frequently place blame on others for own mistakes
Remains mean or spiteful

Because the patient exhibited anger towards the therapist and behaved disrespectfully, it is suggested that the client is experiencing ODD. The client exhibited no fear of the consequences of her actions for being noncompliant.

Therapeutic Approach

The preferred therapeutic approach to be used with the client is child-based therapy and parent training. This is the preferred psychotherapies for the clients diagnosed with ODD (Katzmann, et al, 2018).

Child-based therapy focuses on problem-solving whereas parent training supports parents to develop skills required for the management of troublesome behavior of their child (Goertz-Dorten, et al., 2019). This is accomplished by applying the technique of limiting involuntary positive reinforcement of troublesome behavior (Goertz-Dorten, et al., 2019).

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is identified to be effective psychotherapy for clients with ODD (Katzmann, et al, 2018). Therefore, the client would be referred to CBT and parent training would be referred for the parents.

Psychotropic medications appropriate for the treatment of ODD are second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) (Arnold & Moody, 2018). Risperdal is the brand name of risperidone, which is considered the preferred psychopharmacological agent for the treatment of ODD because of its proven efficacy for adolescents (Arnold & Moody, 2018). Therefore, the appropriate psychotropic medication for the client would be Risperdal.

The expected outcome for the client based on selected therapeutic approaches will be that parents will be able to have a better understanding of their child’s behavior. The parents would gain the ability to manage the disruptive behavior of their child.

[Order Now]

It would also be expected that the client would be able to have a better understanding of herself, her thoughts, behavior, and pertinent actions. It is expected that the client would experience a decline in ODD symptoms and become capable of managing her disruptive behavior.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington, DC: Author.

Arnold, M. J., & Moody, A. L. (2018). Atypical Antipsychotics for Disruptive Behavior Disorders in Children and Adolescents. American Family Physician, 97(11), 5-6. Retrieved from https://www.aafp.org/afp/2018/0601/p715.html

Cavanagh, M., Quinn, D., Duncan, D., Graham, T., & Balbuena, L. (2017). Oppositional defiant disorder is better conceptualized as a disorder of emotional regulation. Journal of Attention Disorders, 21(5), 1-9. doi:10.1177/1087054713520221

Goertz-Dorten, A., Benesch, C., Berk-Pawlitzek, E., Faber, M., Hautmann, C., Hellmich, M., & Doepfner, M. (2019). Efficacy of individualized social competence training for children with oppositional defiant disorders/conduct disorders: A randomized controlled trial with an active control group. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(2), 65-65. doi:10.1007/s00787-018-1144-x

Katzmann, J., Döpfner, M., & Görtz-Dorten, A. (2018). Child-based treatment of oppositional defiant disorder: Mediating effects on parental depression, anxiety and stress. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(9), 81-92. doi:10.1007/s00787-018-1181-5

Angry Adolescence Case Analysis Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.