analytical reading response

February 13, 2023

analytical reading response

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

analytical reading response

Analytical Reading Response (approximately 250 words): In your analytical reading response you will examine a longer excerpt of a text to explain how its various parts work together to convey a particular idea. Thinking analytically helps you understand any literary texts in a logical manner without any concerns for your affective responses to them. It allows you to interpret or find the meaning(s) of them (more than your take on it). Where to begin: What do you think the author’s argument is? Is it effective? Two important questions you should ask about the text/argument: how and why/so what? An easy way out: look for conflicts in the text (I am quoting Purdue OWL here: focus on the specific attributes of the text). Ask what speaks strongly to you. Identify elements like the text’s plot, setting, characters, point of view, literary devices, and style (for your assignment choose specific elements and examine their significance). For example, I will try to unpack the following lines (the first page of The White Tiger): ‘The white Tiger’ A Thinking Man And an entrepreneur Living in the world’s center of technology and outsourcing Electronics City Phase 1 (just off Hosur Main Road), Bangalore, India. I believe the author/novel portrays the narrator-protagonist as a confused individual trying to come to terms with who he really is. The antithesis between the constitution of a Thinking Man- somebody who is rational and enlightened and the mentality of a capitalist-entrepreneur reinforces the paradox that the novel introduces. How: repetitiveness of the word enlightened throughout the text against the recurrent images of exploitation and degradation. Why/so what: to underscore how the two traits (humanism and materialism) are at odds with each other. To be more precise, the persisting gap between enlightenment ideals and unethical/unprincipled actions is what the novel/author critiques.

This is Instruction for the essay. You have to pick any text from the book ” the white tiger” I will attach the sample of essay and book pdf.

[Order Now]

analytical reading response

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.