Analysing Ethical Problems Research Paper

December 8, 2022

Analysing Ethical Problems Research Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Analysing Ethical Problems Research Paper

[Order Now]

Identify and analyze specific ethical problem in your current or past organization. Choose a different ethical problem from the one you chose for Mini-Paper #1. Pick a problem of manageable size.

The nature of the ethical problem is up to you but make sure there is an ethical component to the problem since you will be analyzing it. Remember, this is an application exercise not a history lesson or presentation of abstract course material.

This is a mini-paper, which means it should be only 3-5 pages long (12-point Times New Roman, double-spaced). Brief does not mean superficial.

You will have to think carefully to best use the concepts from the course to help you answer the questions. Make sure you consult the grading rubric as you prepare your mini-paper and prior to submission. The grading rubric will be used to grade your mini-paper. In narrative form, address the following areas:

What is the nature of the ethical breakdown?
What about the situation do you question ethically?
What about the situation do you find acceptable?
How common is this problem?
What guidance does the organization provide?
What actions would you recommend?
What did you learn new about managing ethical challenges?

APA guidelines are required. It is strongly suggested that you use these questions as sub-headings in your mini-paper to ensure you address each area and that the instructor can locate specific material expected to address each of the questions.

Key Concepts for Week Four

Chapter Ten

Global culture, values, and practices Multinational corporations United Nations Global Compact Global ethical risks US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Labor and right to work Global Principles for Ethical Business Conduct

[Order Now]

Chapter Eleven

Defining ethical leadership Seven Habits of Strong Ethical Leaders Conflict Management Styles Ethical leadership communication Ways to avoid group think in small group decision making Leader-follower congruence

Six leadership styles RADAR Model

Chapter Twelve

Sustainability Global environmental issues Atmospheric Water Land Laws protecting the environment Positive links between environmental and economic performance Environmental strategic audit.

Analysing Ethical Problems Research Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.