american history discussion post

January 30, 2023

american history discussion post

Order Number	653876534212457658
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

american history discussion post

Nativism and Social Segregation

As the United States entered the 20th century, it grappled with two key issues that plagued the ethics of its society, particularly in its growing urban cities …. nativism and social segregation. Both ethical ills reflected on powerful internal forces within our society that were tearing at the heart of the ideals of our great democratic experiment. If you recall the PowerPoint Slide # 3 in this week’s lesson, these issues of nativism and social segregation were addressed in two brief video clips … Please review them again here

(on Social Segregation) …. and ponder an answer to the following questions …

Question One : (Please answer ALL PARTS of this question) Historically, why are poor immigrants always the first people to be victimized in times of social distress … ? (Note what is specifically addressed in the video) Historically, how did the conditions surrounding tenement living lead to social reform …. ? (Note what is specifically addressed in the video)

Question # 2 Why does understanding the situations of the people who were exposed to both nativism and tenement living matter to our recollection of their historical significance to our nation’s past … ? … In other words, Why does this historical knowledge matter ?

Your response should have at least two or more substantive paragraphs for Question One and for Question Two!

[Order Now]

american history discussion post

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.