American Film in 1940s and 1950s

December 21, 2022

American Film in 1940s and 1950s

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

American Film in 1940s and 1950s

[Order Now]

Description

The Annotated Bibliography

Generally, this is a research tool. This is where the person, who puts together the annotated bibliography, has researched, read, and assembled a collection of books and article for a specific purpose.

Topic: American Film in 1940s and 1950s

I have provided an example for you to look at, there should be one in your book as well.

Note several things from the example:

Heading – yours should be adapted to your class, but formatted identically.

Creative Title – what will yours be?

Double Spaced throughout.

The Citations begin at the Margin (using a hanging indent for the second line.)

The text portion (the summary on the example) is indented.

Each entry is done per MLA Style

The entries are laid out in alphabetical order Your Annotated Bibliography will be more scholarly than the example. For the purpose of your Annotated Bib, you will follow the example as provided, but you will do the following:

Complete the Bibliography using 3 of the articles related to your topic (Film Noir or Hitchcock)

Each Annotation should be 250 words. But, think about your work last week…you have already summarized and placed them in context or their rhetorical situation. You should able to copy and paste and then revise and edit.

You have done the hard work.

Do the MLA citation as indicated on the example. The example Annotated Bib that I have provided only offers a summary.

You will: The First Paragraph should: Place each work in the context/Rhetorical Situation (Think PIGSAC: Persona, Intent, Genre, Subject, Audience, Context from last week and ); and,

Summarize the article. You should be able to go to your journals that you already completed. From there you can cut and paste that first paragraph here. For those of you who did not do the work, you will have to create them.

Note: This part of the Annotated Bib can be two paragraphs The last paragraph of each entry should discuss where the value of the article is to the topic.

If you need help or ideas in linking them – look at the internet read about the articles and what “Smart people” say about them – maybe they can help you when you are struggling.

[Order Now]

American Film in 1940s and 1950s

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.