Air Force Requirement to Attract More Women Report

December 2, 2022

Air Force Requirement to Attract More Women Report

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Air Force Requirement to Attract More Women Report

[Order Now]

Read attached document for directions. Read all attached links in order to answer all questions correctly thoroughly in paragraphs which is all in Current Event Report.docx. The main document will have links you need to read in order to answer the questions and other attachments below in order to complete this assignment. Please format it and follow the descriptions below.

Format instructions (2 – 5 points will be deducted for each instruction not followed)1.The reports should be a minimum of six full pages, (the average is usually 6 – 8), typewritten, double-spaced, 12-point font; (you may go over the page limit, but not by more than a page or two)2.Write in paragraph form, answering the questions in order, but do not include the questions or number your answers;3.Number the pages;4.Margins should be one inch on all sides; (many default settings are 1.25 inches);5.Do not leave extra room between paragraphs; (many default settings do so);6.Place your name, class and date single-spaced in the upper right corner of the page.

Business Law and Ethical Behavior for Managers Essay

Remember the Framework for Ethical Decision Making that we first saw in Week 1? It gave us a five-step process for ethical decision making. There is a word bank below to refresh your memory about the five steps in the decision-making process. Complete the word bank below by typing into the blanks.

A Framework for Ethical Decision Making (Links to an external site.) – Infographic

ALSO, to receive full credit you must TYPE AT LEAST 140 WORDS and reply to the comment of someone else.

ANSWER THIS QUESTION BY TYPING IMMEDIATELY BELOW HERE: Give an example of when the five-step process might save a business manager from ethical trouble. Make up a brief factual situation and explain how applying the five-step process could prevent an ethical misstep. Use your imagination but keep a business-manager perspective to your answer.

[Order Now]

TYPE HERE:

WORD BANK:

TEST IT

OUTCOME

EVALUATE ALTERNATIVE

ETHICAL

FACTS

A FRAMEWORK FOR ETHICAL DECISION MAKING

RECOGNIZE AN _____ ISSUE

GET THE _____

_____ _____ ACTIONS

MAKE A DECISION AND _____ _____

ACT AND REFLECT ON THE _____

Air Force Requirement to Attract More Women Report

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.