Agreements (NDAs) And Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs)Scenario

Agreements (NDAs) And Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs)Scenario

Instructions/Descriptions

Agreements (NDAs) And Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs)Scenario

[Order Now]

An oil company’s senior management has reason to suspect that John Smith, one of the

company’s mechanical engineers allegedly took information that was clearly identified as

proprietary. The company’s legal office has requested digital evidence regarding the potential

violation of company policy, which prohibits the sharing of proprietary information without prior

approval. The employee was not authorized to access proprietary information. All employees

sign nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) and acceptable use policies (AUPs). Senior management

and the legal office have approved this request.

You are a member of the investigative team that has been asked to develop an investigative plan

of action.

REQUIREMENTS

1. Create an investigative plan of action based on forensic best practices or standards that your

team will implement by doing the following:

1. Discuss the strategy that your team will use to both maximize the collection of evidence

and minimize the impact on the organization.

2. Describe the tools and techniques your team will use in evidence gathering, preparation,

and analysis.

3. Describe how your team will collect and preserve required evidence, using standardized

and accepted procedures.

4. Describe how your team will examine the seized evidence to determine which items are

related to the suspected violation of company policy.

5. Discuss an approach that your team will use to draw conclusions based on the digital

evidence that supports the claim of a policy violation.

6. Discuss how the case details and conclusions should be presented to senior management.
7. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted,

paraphrased, or summarized.

1. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

RUBRIC

A1:STRATEGY

The submission accurately discusses the

strategy that will be used

to both maximize the collection of

evidence and minimize the impact on the

organization, and the description is based

on forensic best practices or standards.

A2:TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES

The submission accurately describes the tools

and techniques to be used in evidence gathering,

preparation, and analysis, and the description is

based on forensic best practices or standards.

A3:COLLECTION AND PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE

The submission accurately describes

how required evidence will be collected

and preserved using standardized and

accepted procedures, and the description

is based on forensic best practices or

standards.

A4:EXAMINATION OF EVIDENCE

The submission accurately describes how the

seized evidence will be examined to determine

which items are related to the suspected

violation of company policy, and the description

is based on forensic best practices or standards.

A5:APPROACH TO DRAWING CONCLUSIONS

The submission accurately discusses an approach

that will lead to drawing conclusions based on the

digital evidence that supports the claim of policy

violation, and the discussion is based on forensic

best practices or standards.

A6:PRESENTATION OF DETAILS AND CONCLUSIONS

The submission accurately discusses how the

case details and conclusions should be presented

to senior management, and the discussion is

based on forensic best practices or standards

.[Order Now]

B:SOURCES

The submission includes in-text citations for sources

that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized

and a reference list that accurately identifies the author,

date, title, and source location as available or the

candidate does not use sources.

C:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION

Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and

focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or

chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used

correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning.

Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate

interpretation and understanding.

Agreements (NDAs) And Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs)Scenario

RUBRIC Excellent Quality 95-100%   Introduction 45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Literature Support 91-84  points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Methodology 58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. Average Score 50-85% 40-38 points More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. 83-76  points There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. 52-49  points The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Poor Quality 0-45% 37-1 points The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. 75-1 points There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. 48-1 points There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Agreements (NDAs) And Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs)Scenario Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

Agreements (NDAs) And Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs)Scenario

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!