Agile Project Management

January 24, 2023

Agile Project Management

Order Number	6534567543356534
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Agile Project Management

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW

The annotated bibliography will investigate a topic of your choice (from the list provided) so that you may review literature and research in an area of interest, making it applicable to your current environment.

INSTRUCTIONS Research current scholarly articles that pertain to your topic. Note items of interest about both the author(s) of the article and the article itself. Take notes and develop a brief summary of each article you include, then develop your annotated bibliography. Your annotated bibliography must consist of at least 10 scholarly (from peer-reviewed journals), and current sources (within the last 5 years) directly related to your project management topic. Be sure that you select a variety of respected sources. The annotation for each reference must include all of the following: · Who the author is and how they are qualified · A brief summary of the article · A reflection on the source and how it fits in the topic chosen for research · An analysis of the article and its value, applicability, etc. · Each annotation should be around 150 words long. · Format the annotated bibliography in current APA style. Include a title page with the topic as part of your title. No additional reference page is needed.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the course plagiarism tool. Topics for Annotated Bibliography

Agile Project Management

[Order Now]

Agile Project Management

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.