administration and protection, health and medicine homework help

December 5, 2022

administration and protection, health and medicine homework help

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

administration and protection, health and medicine homework help

[Order Now]

In your local newspaper, an article was written about the crimes and harms perpetrated against the older population and the lack of protection for many of them. The article ends with the question, “Who is responsible for protecting these individuals?” Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word letter to the editor answering that question from the perspective of one working in the long-term care field. In your letter, address the following:

Analyze the responsibilities of individuals for protecting the rights of older adults. Consider the following: ◦When should families be responsible for related older adults? When should they not? Does this only pertain to immediate family members? ◦When should friends or acquaintances be responsible? What if their choices go against the family’s wishes? ◦When should hospitals, community service organizations, or other long-term care facilities be allowed to make major decisions for older adults? ◦When should the government be responsible for making important decisions? How involved should the government be in protecting the individual? ◦Is there ever a circumstance when an older adult does not need outside protection? When would that be? Explain your answers.
Compare differences of private, nonprofit, and public entities. Consider the following: ◦Legal issues ◦Services ◦Certification ◦Accreditation ◦Auditing ◦How administrators and facilities play a role in the protection of older adults •Analyze the prevalence of abuse against the aging population. Include: ◦A description of the types of abuses ◦Statistics to support your claims
Evaluate the effects of fraud on the aging population and the long-term care system. ◦Consider the financial implications on individuals, organizations, and the health care system. •Analyze Elder Law Services. ◦How can these services help protect the rights of older adults? •Determine the role of advocacy in protecting the rights of older adults. Consider the following: ◦What advocacy services are available for older adults? Does everyone have the same access to these services? Explain why or why not. ◦How effective are advocacy services at protecting the rights of older adults? Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.

administration and protection, health and medicine homework help

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.