Order Number |
06734246733 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Write a planetary geology focused review of one of the following movies and post it to the discussion forum.
The Martian (2015) Available on MaxGo (stream) and Google Play
The Martian: From IMDB: “During a manned mission to Mars, Astronaut Mark Watney is presumed dead after a fierce storm and left behind by his crew. But Watney has survived and finds himself stranded and alone on the hostile planet. With only meager supplies, he must draw upon his ingenuity, wit and spirit to subsist and find a way to signal to Earth that he is alive.” Blockbuster, Academy Award nominated film based on a fun book.
The assignment:
Your review must include a critique of the “science” in the movie using what you’ve learned in this class and other sources (e.g. web pages, textbooks)- is the scenario geologically plausible? List instances of “good science” where the moviemakers did their homework, and “bad science,” where reality is tossed out the window in favor of a more exciting movie. You don’t have to catch every last minor inaccuracy, but hopefully you’ll catch the big ones! Include at least some geological critique (e.g. a criticism of how gravity on a spaceship is handled is fine, but make sure you also include something about the geology- e.g. what would the surface of an asteroid look like? What would a sandstorm really be like on another planet?
Also include a brief description of how scientists are portrayed in the film, if they appear at all- does it seem realistic or stereotyped? Do you think that in a real-world situation scientists would be more or less involved with the disaster/mission/issue?
List all sources you used (including web pages, the online “textbook,” and class notes). If you don’t use any sources, state that explicitly. Anything copied from another source must be in quotes, with the source acknowledged. Any ideas or material paraphrased from external sources must be cited in text, with a full reference in your list at the end. That includes websites! Target length: 500 words.