Socialization and Biases in Social Media

February 13, 2023

Socialization and Biases in Social Media

Order Number	776563452647643
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Socialization and Biases in Social Media

Be sure to answer ALL questions in the prompt.

As we already know, social media affects our lives in many ways. This brings up the classic dilemma of which came first. Are people with specific attributes drawn to the social media they use, or do they develop these characteristics because of the social media they use; how, if at all, have the attributes of individuals changed as time and technology progressed?

Check out the three links below to craft your response this week. Provide an overview of what each link discusses and provide examples to help answer the above questions regarding social media and individual characteristics. Take note of the date on the articles as well. Do you think that makes a difference?

10 facts about Americans and Facebook

Teens, Social Media and Technology 2018

Social networking sites and our lives

Think about the above and your own social media usage. What kind(s) do you use and why? What do you think about the attributes listed above for different social media users?

Choose two bullet points below to answer:

* How has your social media usage shaped your attitudes and behaviors over time? Can you identify any examples of the cultivation theory at work in your own social media usage?

* Have you ever learned something new through observation on social media? How does this align with the social learning theory?

* Do you find that your social media usage tends to amplify your existing beliefs, as described in the agenda-setting theory? Can you think of any examples of this happening?

* How do you use social media to escape from challenges or be entertained? How does this align with the uses and gratification theory?

* Can you think of any schemas used in your social media usage? How do these mental frameworks help you make sense of the information you encounter on social media?

[Order Now]

Socialization and Biases in Social Media

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.