Word Analysis

February 10, 2023

Word Analysis

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Word Analysis

Choose a word as your focus of topic and write a three point argument essay. This word should NOT be a racial slur. You can choose an equally controversial word that has to do with something else like: feminine, masculine, introvert, extrovert, confident, honest, loser, drama queen, sensitive, etc. Please do not use any of the listed examples and follow the guidelines below.

You could write about how a particular word has been misperceived or misunderstood, or how your particular word should or should not be banned from the English language. These reasons could be that the particular word has certain harmful effects, or & why we need to change our social definition (connotation) of a particular word. Whichever approach you choose, you must take a clear “side.” (6-7 paragraph essay with 10-11 lines per paragraph.)

Introduction: tell generally what society typically thinks when it hears your chosen word, or start with how the dictionary defines that word, and give a general discussion to lead into a three-point thesis with the following structure: The word ________ should (or should not) be outlawed because ________, _________, and __________.

Background: The second paragraph could include a dictionary definition and discussion of the denotation of the word. You could also include discussion on how society is more politically-correct (or aware) of word usage, talk about that, tell whether or not that is good or bad, and start to tell us what the “typical” expectations and meanings of your word are, and how society is right or wrong about those expectations and meanings, and lead into your three points.

Always start each point with “the first reason why the word “_____” is (or is not) harmful to American society is…. (or you can say “the first reason why the word “___” should (or should not) be banned/used is…..”

Then, thoroughly explain what you mean; give examples, tell why that is either good or bad.

Thoroughly discuss the “true” meaning, and why it should or should NOT be outlawed.

Discuss why people (tell which people) would disagree with this point, and give an answer to their opposition. Wrap up your point, and transition into the next point. You do not have to limit each point to one paragraph.

[Order Now]

Word Analysis

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.