Genetics and the Environment

February 9, 2023

Genetics and the Environment

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Genetics and the Environment

In this discussion, you will have the opportunity to apply some of the theories and concepts you’ve learned in the eText readings and explorations to your own development or the development of others in general. Remember, as a human experiencing growth and development, you make an excellent subject.

Instructions

Please watch the documentary – The First 8 Weeks: 9 Months that Made You and Nature and Nurture in Psychology. Then, post your response to either option A or B in the forum with an appropriate subject line that includes which option you have chosen.

Discuss the challenges psychologist face when trying to determine whether personality traits, temperament, or other psychological aspects are caused by nature or nurture.

Imagine that you are a developmental psychologist and using either your own individual development or your observations of human beings in general as evidence, please answer the following: What aspects of your or others personality do you attribute to nature? What aspects of your or others personality do you attribute to nurture? How did you draw these conclusions? Consider a brief counterargument to your conclusions. Please provide specific examples and a logical explanation based on the readings in the eText and exploration pages for why you see these aspects of personality as more influenced by nature or nurture.

A birth plan was envisioned to help expectant parents prepare for the physical and emotional aspects of the birthing process.

This tool can also be used as a way to communicate concerns, expectations and preferences to their medical provider and birthing team. Read the article, Creating Your Birth Plan, as if you were an expecting parent. Of the 21 specific questions designed to help you write a birth plan, choose 10 that you feel are the most important to you personally and answer them. For each answer, please provide a brief explanation. If you have already had a child without a birth plan, how might have things been different if you had a written a plan? If you have not yet had a child, how might having a plan help you through the process of having a baby?

Checklist for Maximum Points:

Initial post is a minimum of 500 words (not including references)

Initial post is made by due date posted in the schedule

Initial post references and cites the textbook and one additional academic source using correct APA format

[Order Now]

Genetics and the Environment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.