near miss and malpractice in Saudi Arabia

February 9, 2023

near miss and malpractice in Saudi Arabia

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

near miss and malpractice in Saudi Arabia

Create a PowerPoint presentation detailing the standard operating procedure in dealing with “near misses” in your facility. Be sure to address the following issues: Examine any applicable rules and regulations pertaining to malpractice in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Detail a specific procedure in dealing with the reporting of medical errors in a healthcare facility. Your presentation should meet the following structural requirements: Organized, using professional themes and transitions. It should consist of nine slides, not including the title and reference slides. Each slide must provide detailed speaker’s notes, with a minimum of 100 words per slide. Notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials. Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of six scholarly articles. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but the other four must be external. The Saudi Digital Library is a good place to find these references. Follow APA 7th edition and Saudi Electronic University writing standards.

Almannie, R., Almuhaideb, M., Alyami, F., Alkhayyal, A., & Binsaleh, S. (2021). The status of medical malpractice litigations in Saudi Arabia: Analysis of the annual report. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 15(2), 97. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191242/ Al Madani, R., Al-Rayes, S. A., & Alumran, A. (2020). Policies vs Practice of Medical Error Disclosure at a Teaching Hospital in Saudi ArabiaMedical.Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 13, 825. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381814/ Alanazi, A. S., Alqurashi, M. A., & Al-Hanawi, M. K. (2021). Causes and Outcomes of Dental Malpractice Litigation in the Riyadh Region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Health Systems Research, 1(2), 81-87. https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/516578 Wang, F., & Krishnan, S. K. (2019). Medical malpractice claims within cardiology from 2006 to 2015. The American Journal of Cardiology, 123(1), 164-168. Module 09 PowerPoint Slide

[Order Now]

near miss and malpractice in Saudi Arabia

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.