functional ability and health disparities

January 25, 2023

functional ability and health disparities

Order Number	64356676324556553
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

functional ability and health disparities

For this discussion, review the assigned readings and optional resources pertaining to functional ability and health disparities. In your initial post, provide a comprehensive description of health disparities, including the role(s) of the nurse in in decreasing health disparities for a chosen population. Select one of the two Hondros Village patients Terrell Wallace or Dale Mayman. Using the concepts of functional ability and/or health disparities discuss a plan to improve care for your chosen patient. Discussion Submission Instructions This discussion requires one (1) initial post (IP) and two (2) reply posts (RPs). These posts will be assessed according to the NUR 230 Discussion Grading Rubric. For your one (1) initial post: Click Start a New Thread and enter the title and content of your post in the appropriate boxes. Click Post when you are ready to submit. We recommend that you type your post in Microsoft Word, save it to your computer, and then copy and paste the text into MyClassroom. This way, you reduce the chance of losing your work in the rare case of a technical issue. Do not submit the post as an attachment. Your initial post must be at least 250-300 words in length. Your initial post is due on 11:55 PM Eastern Time on Thursday of this week. Your initial post requires the use of at least one (1) outside source with citation and reference to support your discussion. Your citation and reference must be formatted using APA Style. For your two (2) reply posts: Read all of your colleagues’ initial posts. Click the Reply to Thread link underneath the title of the ones you wish to respond to. Your reply posts must be at least 150-200 words in length. Your reply posts are due on 11:55 PM Eastern Time on Sunday of this week. Any information gathered from outside sources must be cited and referenced using APA Style. Click here for an overview of APA Style citations and references. For more information about APA Style, use the APA Resources link in the left navigation of this course.

[Order Now]

functional ability and health disparities

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.