Patient, Family, or Population Health Problem Solution 1

January 7, 2023

Patient, Family, or Population Health Problem Solution

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Patient, Family, or Population Health Problem Solution

$50 FOR THE ESSAY AND $50 FOR THE BROCHURE – $100 TOTAL

In this assessment, you’ll develop an intervention as a solution to the health problem you’ve defined. To prepare for the assessment, think about an appropriate intervention, based on your work in the preceding assessments, that will produce tangible, measurable results for the patient, family, or group.

In addition, you might consider using a root cause analysis to explore the underlying reasons for a problem and as the basis for developing and implementing an action plan to address the problem. Some appropriate interventions include the following: Creating an educational brochure. Producing an educational voice-over PowerPoint presentation or video focusing on your topic. Creating a teaching plan for your patient, family, or group. Recommending work process or workflow changes addressing your topic. Plan to spend at least 3 direct practicum hours working with the same patient, family, or group. In addition, you may wish to complete the following: Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. Conduct sufficient research of the scholarly and professional literature to inform your work and meet scholarly expectations for supporting evidence. Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page.

Instructions Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) develop an intervention as a solution to the problem and (b) submit your proposed intervention, with a written analysis, to your faculty for review and approval. Part 1 Develop an intervention, as a solution to the problem, based on your assessment and supported by data and scholarly, evidence-based sources. Incorporate relevant aspects of the following considerations that shaped your understanding of the problem: Leadership. Collaboration. Communication.

Change management. Policy. Quality of care. Patient safety. Costs to the system and individual. Technology. Care coordination. Community resources. Part 2 Submit your proposed intervention to your faculty for review and approval. In a separate written deliverable, write a 5–7 page analysis of your intervention. Summarize the patient, family, or population problem. Explain why you selected this problem as the focus of your project. Explain why the problem is relevant to your professional practice and to the patient, family, or group. In addition, address the requirements outlined below. These requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria for this assessment, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

Define the role of leadership and change management in addressing the problem. Explain how leadership and change management strategies influenced the development of your proposed intervention. Explain how nursing ethics informed the development of your proposed intervention. Include a copy of the intervention/solution/professional product. Propose strategies for communicating and collaborating with the patient, family, or group to improve outcomes associated with the problem. Identify the patient, family, or group. Discuss the benefits of gathering their input to improve care associated with the problem. Identify best-practice strategies from the literature for effective communication and collaboration to improve outcomes. Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies guided the development of your proposed intervention. Cite the standards and/or policies that guided your work. Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving outcomes for this problem. Explain how your proposed intervention will improve the quality of care, enhance patient safety, and reduce costs to the system and individual.

Cite evidence from the literature that supports your conclusions. Identify relevant and available sources of benchmark data on care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual. Explain how technology, care coordination, and the utilization of community resources can be applied in addressing the problem. Cite evidence from the literature that supports your conclusions. Write concisely and directly, using active voice. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references. Additional Requirements Format: Format the written analysis of your intervention using APA style. APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include: A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required. Appropriate section headings. Length: Your paper should be approximately 5–7 pages in length, not including the reference page. Supporting evidence: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format. Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.

SAFE Assign must be less than 30%.

$50 for the essay and $50 for the brochure

[Order Now]

Patient, Family, or Population Health Problem Solution

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.