Order Diversity Statement Assignment 1

January 5, 2023

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Order Diversity Statement Assignment

1) How do I define the concepts of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in education?

2a) What changes in education do I see as important as we address issues of diversity, equity, inclusion in striving for justice in teaching and learning?

b) What must change in how my discipline is taught? Where are the barriers, exclusions, or oppressions of learners and learning that we must change?

c) What must change in our legacy teaching methods? How do current methods exclude many learners or block optimum learning? What do you know from learning science that supports your perspectives?
3) How do some of my own experiences inform my stance on diversity, inclusion, and equity in education? How did I come to be aware of my positionality (privileges, oppressions, opportunities, barriers)?

4a) How do I practice justice in education in my approach to designing curricula, learning environments, and processes in teaching my discipline?

b) What are my guiding values and principles?

c) What specific strategies do I use to ensure all voices are invited, honored, and supported in my curricula materials and class engagement?
5a)How do I engage with DEI work beyond the classroom at campus level as well as in scholarly or professional spaces?

b) How and why do I engage formally and informally with campus resources and initiatives that support DEI?

c) In what ways am I an ally to students and an advocate for greater inclusion and equity on campus?

d) What are some issues with respect to DEI in my discipline with regard to research/scholarship and in teaching?

e) As an educator in my discipline, how do I keep myself informed of conversations about and professional development in ethical teaching innovations?

f) As a scholar and researcher, how do I engage DEI principles in methods and in representing broader populations and ways of knowing and articulating scholarship?

6) Write a short elevator pitch or summary of your stance in addressing issues of Diversity, inclusion, and Equity as an ethical educator. Imagine that you have been asked at an interview what your position is about diversity, inclusion, and equity and you have just a few moments to communicate it. This elevator pitch is also something you can add to your syllabus and to your professional website

Order Diversity Statement Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.