Buy Rough Draft Complaint Email Discussing

January 2, 2023

Buy Rough Draft Complaint Email Discussing

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Buy Rough Draft Complaint Email Discussing

Claim Email: Catering

You are the manager of Best Electronics, a large electronics store in Tempe, AZ. On January 5, 2019, you arranged a Beginning-of-the-Year party for your 30 employees. You chose Super Subs and Sandwiches as a catering company for this event. The food that was delivered was flawless; however, there was a problem with the correct fulfillment of your order and two problems with the service.

Write a claim email to Super Subs and Sandwiches. Please refer to the strategies for writing claim letters that we discussed in class:

Try to connect with the reader by using the “you” attitude and including a clear purpose statement in your opening paragraph.
Provide relevant information such as invoice number and date of service.
Explain logically, clearly, and specifically what went wrong. If there were any inconveniences incurred by your company, provide details. Pay attention to creating a visually appealing document.
State what you expect the catering company to do about the issues you encountered. Maintain a courteous and positive tone.
The tone of the claim letter is important. The most effective complaint letters do not sound complaining, angry, or annoyed. Assume that the recipient will be conscientious in correcting the problem.

Buy Rough Draft Complaint Email Discussing

Please use the following format:

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

We will critique your rough draft in an in-class workshop.

Rubric
Some RubricSome RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplete rough draftA complete rough draft contains all the elements of the assignment (content, format, expected length). Incomplete drafts will not earn any points.10.0 ptsFull Marks0.0 ptsNo Marks10.0

Buy Rough Draft Complaint Email Discussing

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.