Human Anatomy And Physiology Special Paper

December 31, 2022

Human Anatomy And Physiology Special Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Human Anatomy And Physiology Special Paper

Brief Instructions for Special Topics papers:

Goals:

1. to encourage self-learning in anatomy and physiology related to your professional goals or personal interest

2. to become familiar with CCBC’s electronic journals

3. to become familiar with PubMed, the biomedical literature database of the National Library of Medicine

4. to practice and/or improve writing skills in communication concepts in biology

Instructions:

1. Topic:

a) The topic must be anatomy and physiology – e.g., not epidemiology, genetics, personal dialog, or social science or health infrastructure, management, or policy. That said, you may include a sentence ot two addressing non-A&P in the introduction if you like, but then switch to A&P

b) It is preferred that the topic be relevant to you and the pursuit of knowledge in your chosen field. Please search the electronic journals for a relatively narrow topic that can be more easily addressed than a broad one. Those in specific areas should explore a paper or narrow topic in areas such as radiographic imaging, dentistry, or respiratory imaging. Otherwise, people pursuing more general areas, such as coding, might elect to explore a topic personally relevant to them.

c) Do not write about topics considered to be regular, core content in our course, i.e., don’t describe how the heart works or about the biology of the integument, or anything that is already in our textbooks. You should be investigating material beyond the scope of the course.

2. Audience: Write to a biologically-informed audience, not in the 4th-6th grade style used in the web; you are not writing to the public. You do not need to define terms that are already defined in our text; assume that the reader already knows this. Note that websites are written to 6th grade-level readers – please go to the e-journals for resource material.

3. Length: There must be a minimum of two written pages of text, single-spaced. Space occupied by any added tables, figures or lists, must be compensated for by text to achieve the equivalent of two pages (having more than two pages is okay). Titles must be same font and size (11 or 12 pt) – a bold-faced title and one line separating it from the text. Margins are to be set on normal or wider) and larger font tiles, wordy introductions, and wide margins on any side will cost you points.

4. Style: Some folks try and cut corners with large fonts, wide margins, and large sections of space accorded to the title.

a) Font size: 11 pt or 12 pt font size for text. Titles should be no more than 20 pt in size. DON’T WASTE SPACE!!!

b) Page margins: “normal” or “narrow” margins, as defined in MS Word.

c) lists are considered to be tables, not writing

d) do not use conversational (colloquial) tones or first person pronouns (you. I, me, we, us)

e) use the reference section for citing names and such. Avoid references such as “..according to Dr. Broken Legg, of

Saskatchewan University…” . This is considered to be “filler” and is distracting to the reader.

f) never use quotations unless offering the reader something that might have more than one interpretation

5. Referencing: Please attach a bibliography at the end of the paper, number each reference, and cite only those numbers in the text. e.g.,

“Bone growth shows at 12% decrease over a ten year period [3]”.

This sentence refers to reference number 3 (below) in the reference section following the two-page paper. The reference section is not part of the two pages. The format of the reference should be stated as follows:

Author(s). Article Title. Journal Title, Volume number, pages (year). Citations must be clearly accessible. APA style, in-text referencing of author names is both redundant and unnecessarily disruptive to good reading flow, and therefore considered here to diminish effective, written communication. The reference section would have:

3. Ichinose PU, Scratchyhead K, and IA Blockhead. Images of ice cream in the lateral ventricles. Image Science 54: 567-583 (2010)

[Order Now]

Human Anatomy And Physiology Special Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.