Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
You have now completed activities on the divide between patient-centered care and actual practice, accreditation compliance, meaningful use, leadership strategies, the importance of data analysis and reporting, how technology plays a role in quality improvement, and the importance of value-based reimbursement. Completing these key activities will help you determine the status of patient quality at your organization.
In this activity, you will identify recommendations to improve the current level of quality or safety. If you are not currently working, select a previous employer or an organization from the Joint Commission Quality Check website, and view the accreditation report.
After viewing the required video and reading the required articles for this module, create a Word table and list three goals to address your concerns or recommendations to improve quality at the organization. Also include a proposed timeline for beginning implementation and completing the goal.
page1image2623066944
The three goals could address the areas listed below or others you identify:
Technology issues
Accreditation
Process improvement
Quality improvement
Communication improvement
Performance improvement
Video Link :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKa9NyCGGxw%29
Grading Rubric
cellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/