Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Project Management Organizational Framework
I will not pay more than my bid! DO NOT USE ANOTHER STUDENT WORK! IT WILL BE CHECKED.
Follow Directions: Essay Questions-Respond to each essay question with a minimum of 300 Words. Cite your sources and include references for each.
Essay question 1: Describe the differences between PERT and CPM analysis. Under what circumstances would you use PERT over CPM? Why?
Essay question 2: Assume that you were assigned a project to manage, and, upon inspection of the project schedule, you observe that there is more than one critical path. What would be your reaction and how would you respond?
Essay question 3: Should all activities that are considered essential for the success of the project be included in the project critical path? Why or why not?
Essay question 4: Discuss the role of the project team and the project manager in determining the duration of project activities. How does the team determine activity durations?
Essay question 5: Assume that you have assigned durations to each activity and have sequenced all activities in the project schedule. Now that this process is complete, the project sponsor observes that the schedule takes too much time. What are your options as a project manager?
Project Management Organizational Framework
Grading Rubric
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/