Buy International Insecurity And Use Of Force

December 26, 2022

Buy International Insecurity And Use Of Force

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

Buy International Insecurity And Use Of Force

Running head: DATA MINING 1

DATA MINING 4

Assignment 2: International Insecurity and the Use of Force

Due Week 6 and worth 200 points

Incorporate the professor’s feedback from Assignment 1 in order to proficiently develop Assignment 2.

Use scholarly journal articles and/or Strayer academic databases to complete additional research on your selected topic. Use the major international political event that you selected for Assignment 1 in order to complete this assignment.

Use the basic outline below to draft your paper. Organize your responses to each question (except Question 5) under the following section headings:

•Part II: International Insecurity and the Use of Force of [Name of Select Major International Event]

•The Media, the People, and Public Opinion (for Question 1)

•The Impact of Foreign Policies (for Question 2)

•International Insecurity (for Question 3)

•Use of Force (for Question 4)

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you separate the content into sections:

1.Explain the fundamental manner in which transnational actors, interest groups, public opinion, and the media have influenced your chosen event. Provide relevant examples of such influence in action to support your response.

2.Discuss which foreign policies developed by the main participants played a role in your chosen event. Evaluate the extent to which the chosen policies impacted your chosen event. Provide examples of the impact to support your rationale.

3.Analyze the key role(s) that international insecurity played in the development of your chosen event. Provide a rationale for your response.

4.Analyze whether or not the use of force concept was used in your chosen event. Argue whether or not the use or non-use of force concept was justified. Provide examples where force was used to support your rationale.

5.Use at least three (3) additional quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

•Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

•Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

•Evaluate the theories and systems of international politics.

•Analyze how international politics influences the various levels of public administration and its effects on groups and individuals.

•Differentiate among international conflict, security, terrorism, military force, weapons of mass destruction, and their effects on war and peace.

•Analyze the major developments in international politics and how they have evolved.Use technology and information resources to research issues in international public administration.

•Use technology and information resources to research issues in international public administration

•Write clearly and concisely about international public administration using proper writing mechanics.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

[Order Now]

Buy International Insecurity And Use Of Force

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.