Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Buy Financial Corporate Accounting Assignment
Decide upon an initiative you want to implement that would increase sales over the next five years, (for example, market another product, corporate expansion, and so on).
Using the sample financial statements, create pro forma statements of FIVE year projectionsthat are clear, concise, and easy to read. Be sure to double check the calculations in your pro forma statements. Make assumptions that support each line item increase or decrease for your forecasted statements.
Discuss and interpret the financials in relation to the initiative. Make recommendations on potential discretionary financing needs.
Write a 350 – 700 word analysis of the company’s short term and long term financing needs and determine strategies for the company to manage working capital.
*****************************************************************************************************************
Step 1: You must decide what your base objective is. Are you adding a new product, expanding overall operations, etc? Discuss this in general. Basically, tell me why you are choosing this objective and what you expect to accomplish within 5 years.
Step 2: Take a look at your Sample Financial Statements. One link consists of an Income Statement. The other link consists of a Balance Sheet. Consider these Year ZERO. I would actually take both of these documents and import or enter the figures into an Excel Spreadsheet manually as Year ZERO.
Step 3: Once you have reviewed the above documents, then you need to give me FIVE more years of Income Statements AND FIVE more years of Balance Sheets. Year ZERO does NOT count! Your increases/decreases are up to you, but should fall in line with your overall “made up” objective in Step 1. Logic takes precedence over accuracy here as this is an exercise that will allow you to see how increases and decreases affect one statement or both. Do your best here as there are NO points for accuracy. Points are based on GOOD format and logic as it relates to Step 1. **You can either insert the spreadsheet or attach as a separate document.**
Step 4: You must give me a writeup in APA format. Make sure you have an intro, discuss the logic and results from Steps 1-3, and then give me a conclusion. APA format is required. DETAILS re your increases/decreases and results are REQUIRED.
Grading Outline (5 points total):
Introduction – .5 points
Discussion Re Assumptions – .5 points
Income Statement Year One – .25 points
Income Statement Year Two – .25 points
Income Statement Year Three – .25 points
Income Statement Year Four – .25 points
Income Statement Year Five – .25 points
Balance Sheet Year One – .25 points
Balance Sheet Year Two – .25 points
Balance Sheet Year Three – .25 points
Balance Sheet Year Four – .25 points
Balance Sheet Year Five – .25 points
Conclusion – .5 points
APA (includes title page, references, spelling, grammar, readability, etc) – 1 point
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/