School Lunch Shaming

December 22, 2022

School Lunch Shaming

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

School Lunch Shaming

[Order Now]

Description

Assessment Specifics

Argument Essay

Cover Letter

Minimum 200 words (successful cover letters are often longer)

Address letter to your instructor

In a couple sentences only, explain your primary motivation or purpose for writing your draft and describe your audience.

Answer at least 2 of the 5 questions below;

(where applicable) provide brief, specific examples of the following in your cover letter:

What specific revisions did you make in order to improve how you accomplish this purpose and/or appeal to this audience?

Why were these revisions important to make? What feedback did you receive from your peers?

How did you use this feedback to revise your draft? How do these revisions improve your draft? What feedback did you receive from other sources, such as your instructor or tutors? H

ow did you use this feedback to revise your draft? How do these revisions improve your draft? What have you decided to revise in your draft, apart from feedback you received? Why? How do these revisions improve your draft?

What valuable lessons about writing effectively have you learned as a result of composing this project? Place the cover letter on a page just before the first page of your Argument draft (If following MLA style, this will be the first page of your draft document;

if following APA style, this will be the second page of your draft document, just after the title page).

Remove your Purpose Statement.

Your Final Draft An essay taking a stand and making arguments in support of a view or course of action on the issue, problem, or controversy developed in Writing Project 3. Clearly focused, debatable, and supportable thesis statement advocating your view on the problem or controversy Use of evidence from sources, objectively and accurately interpreted, to support your arguments Effective reasoning that demonstrates how the evidence supports the thesis and the specific arguments being made At least one counterargument and rebuttal, in which you accurately present at least one viewpoint or claim in opposition to your stance and effectively refute that claim, using sound reasoning and valid evidence

A logical organizational structure that clearly and effectively guides readers through the arguments being made Introductory paragraph, body paragraphs that present and support your arguments, and concluding paragraph, with topic sentences and transitions

Use of evidence from sources; at least 10 quotations and/or paraphrases, clearly discernible from each other and from the writer’s voice and cited using correct in-text citations

Use of at least 5 relevant and highly credible sources, at least 3 of which come from the Ivy Tech Library databases. (No Print Sources.) APA or MLA manuscript style, as specified by your instructor, with in-text citations and a References or Works Cited list including ALL sources used. (References or Works Cited list does not count in the minimum word-count requirement) Observation of the conventions of Standard English 1500 words for the final draft (the minimum 200 words for the cover letter is statement is not included in this count)

[Order Now

School Lunch Shaming

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.