Complete the Multiple choice Research activity

December 22, 2022

Complete the Multiple choice Research activity

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

Instructions: In 2013, Sherman et al. conducted a study to examine how different forms of communication (text messaging, vs. video chat vs. telephone conversation) can influence feelings of closeness and bonding among friends. They instructed participants to come into the lab with their best friend, and randomly assigned them to engage in a 5-minute conversation in one of the three modalities (text message, video chat, or phone conversations). After the conversation, they measured feelings of closeness on a scale of 1-10. Let’s imagine that you decided to replicate this study with 30 participants (10 participants in each group). You can find the data in the questions below.

Your job will be to figure out whether the three groups are different.

1.What is the appropriate test statistic to calculate to figure out if the three groups differ?

Group of answer choices

an ANOVA (F test)

Dependent sample t-test

z test

Independent sample t-test

State the null hypothesis.

Group of answer choices

Ho: µ1 = µ2 = µ3

Ho: X1 ≠ X2 ≠ X3

State the alternative hypothesis

Group of answer choices

H1: X1 ≠ X2 ≠ X3

H1: µ1 = µ2 = µ3

What is the acceptable level of risk?

Group of answer choices

P>.05

p<.05

P = .5

P<.1

Use this table to answer the following questions:

	Text Message	X²	Video Chat	X²	Phone Conversation	X²
	3		10		6
	3		9		5
	5		8		6
	6		8		6
	4		9		7
	3		8		4
	4		6		5
	2		7		6
	5		7		3
	4		10		6
n							N
ΣX							ΣΣX
X							(ΣΣX)²/N
Σ(X²)							ΣΣ(X²)
(ΣX)²/n							Σ(ΣX)²/n

This one is tough! There are lots of steps we need to take before we can calculate the final test statistic. Let’s break it down into steps. What is the Sum of Squares (SS) between?

Group of answer choices

40.9

935.8

28.47

836.40

95.26

Okay, now let’s figure out what’s the Sum of Squares (SS) within?

Group of answer choices

91.3

166

935.8

58.20

40.9

Okay, what’s the Mean Squares Within (MSwithin)?

Group of answer choices

2.16

4.98

3.381

1.51

What’s the Mean Squares Between (MSBetween)?

Group of answer choices

2.16

47.63

14.23

8.63

Now we’re ready to calculate the test statistic (yay!). Tell me the correct value of the test statistic, round to 2 decimals.

Group of answer choices

F = 31.44

F = 13.39

F = 9.40

F = 3.70

What is the df between (also known as the df Numerator)?

Group of answer choices

df = 2

df = 3

df = 27

df = 30

What is the df within (also known as the df Demominator)?

Group of answer choices

What is the critical value?

Group of answer choices

5.49

3.36

2.87

4.56

Based on the critical value and the obtained value, do you accept or reject the null hypothesis?

Group of answer choices

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

Reject the null hypothesis

Based on your answer to the previous question, should we run a post hoc test (don’t worry, I won’t make you calculate them, I just want to know if we should do a post hoc test in this situation).

Group of answer choices

Yes

Write up your results as you would see them in a research paper. Be sure that you include the means and standard deviations for each group in your write-up, as well as a sentence or two explaining the results! See the powerpoint for help with this. You do not need to calculate or include the post-hoc test here.

[Order Now]

Complete the Multiple choice Research activity

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.