Writing Dentures vs. Implants Essay

December 21, 2022

Writing Dentures vs. Implants Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Writing Dentures vs. Implants Essay

[Order Now]

Description

Required elements for abstract section:

One paragraph (not indented)

No more than 250 words

States problem/issue

Explains relevance of topic

Addresses method used (“A review of the literature was completed to…” Included short statement of findings (summary of important aspects of discussion section that relates to your conclusion statement)

Includes short statement of conclusion

Required elements for introduction section:

Half a page minimum and no longer than one page.

Introduces topic of the paper.

Briefly describes or defines the topic terminology, if needed Fully introduces the background of topic and explains why topic is relevant and/or why the literature review is needed.

Includes generalized epidemiology statistics (incidence and prevalence) in this section, if relevant.

Last sentence is thesis or problem statement. (Specific, with one main idea that is developed and proven through the research detailed in paper.)

Required elements for Review of Literature section: 3 pages minimum Peer-reviewed references

Sources are published within the past 5 years No Historical references are included in this section Two quotations maximum per paragraph Maximum 2-4 citations within each paragraph (in other words paragraphs have a two sentence minimum.)

Describes what has been written in relation to topic/question(s) Identifies the central issues of the topic by integrating what previous researchers have found. Compares results of the studies without drawing conclusions from the comparison. Does not include an opinion-it is ALL about the literature (sources).

Required elements for Methods and Procedures Section: Topic Selection: describes how topic was chosen. Resource Search and Selection: Uses provided text updated “values” from author Libraries/search engines and databases used. Uses provided text updated “values” from author Uses at least one database Search terms. Uses provided text updated “values” from author Boolean strings.

Uses provided text updated “values” from author Age of the Sources: Uses provided text updated “values” from author Required elements for Discussion Section: Identifies and acknowledges areas of significant development and of controversy within the literature. Identifies important issues and formulates questions that need further research and which remain unresolved.

Discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the literature available on your topic. Expresses opinion and supports it with evidence and examples. Includes and comment on evidence of literature that contradicts the opinion, if any.

Required elements for Conclusion Section: Restates topic Restates thesis or problem statement. Provides a mini-summary of major agreements and disagreements, problems, issues, etc. Provides a “call of action” statement No new material is introduced NO CITATIONS

Literature Review Instructions and template_2017 Literature Review Rubric RDH 175

[Order Now]

Writing Dentures vs. Implants Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.