Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Project Evaluation: Earned Value Problem Set
Overview and Rationale
These problem sets offer an opportunity to practice using excel to calculate earned value measures.
Program and Course Outcomes
This assignment provides a baseline understanding to the course topics, and is directly related to these course learning objectives:
LO5: Perform Earned Value analysis to provide both variance and forecasting performance measures for a simulated project
Essential Components
From Chapter 13 of the Gray & Larson textbook (7th edition), complete Exercise 4 that starts on page 489 and continues to 490. To submit your answer, utilize the provided worksheet in Excel that matches those found on pages 489-490 in Gray & Larson and enter the missing data based on the material provided.
Include an “Assessment” section either at the bottom of your table that refers to your calculations, especially your EACf and VACf calculations: what is your assessment of the current status of the project? At completion?
• Status Summary
• Projected Status at Completion (include estimates for cost and budget; to go above and beyond, include details about various tasks that may impact projected status)
If you have not done earned value before, this may take some time to complete, so please be sure to start early working on this assignment.
Complete all calculations in the designated cells within the spreadsheet. Save the spreadsheet
Review the rubric below for grading information.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/