Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
1.) What do you think Montresor’s motivation is for killing Fortunato? What do you think Montresor means in the 1st paragraph of the story by “the thousand injuries” and “insult”?
2.) How does Poe motivate the behavior of Montresor? Does the story provide any hints as to the “thousand injuries” he has suffered? Are any hints necessary?
3.) Who do you suppose the “You” is in the 1st paragraph of the story?
4.) Why do you suppose Poe sets this story during “the carnival season”?
5.) Why is the setting of the story appropriate?
6.) What does Montresor’s treatment of his house servants tell us about his knowledge of human psychology, and how does it prepare us for his treatment of Fortunato?
7.) Examine Montresor’s verbal and non-verbal strategies of initially engaging Fortunato and then luring him along throughout the story.
8.) What do you suppose Montresor means when he says, “You are rich, respected, admired, beloved; you are happy, as once I was. You are a man to be missed. For me it is no matter”?
9.) Discuss Montresor’s family’s coat-of-arms and motto.
10.) Discuss the references to “the brotherhood” and “the masons.”
11.) Discuss the section when Montresor is erecting the wall to entomb Fortunato, especially both Fortunato’s and Montresor’s sounds, words, and movements.
12.) How does Poe increase the elements of suspense as Fortunato is gradually walled into the catacombs?
13.) Examine the very last paragraph of the story – especially (1) the phrase, “My heart grew sick …” and (2) the very last sentence.
14.) Do you see any irony in the story?
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/