Peer Review assignment Instructions

December 21, 2022

Peer Review assignment Instructions

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Peer Review assignment Instructions

[Order Now]

For this assignment, you are to write a ONE-page peer review for each of the essay (see attachment)
This assignment is related to order: 802352 (previously completed by you.)
When conducting your peer review for the Recommendation Report draft, consider the following questions:

Content

Does the report clearly identify a problem or issue?
Is there a clear and developed introduction?
Is there a clear thesis statement that tells the reader the central idea of the report?
Are various sections of the report included (table of contents, executive summary, etc.)?
Are headings used to separate the various sections?
Does the body section directly support the thesis?
Are the ideas well-developed and clear?
Are enough sources used in the report to support the ideas presented?
Are exhibits used effectively to present data?
Is there a clear conclusion that wraps up the report?
Is the report persuasive and compelling?
Has the writer met the minimum page requirement?

Organization

Are sections and paragraphs used effectively to separate ideas?
Are there transitions between paragraphs?
Does the report “flow” well?

Mechanics

Are the sentences well-constructed and clear?
Are there spelling or grammar errors?

Formatting

Is the paper properly formatted (margins, spacing, font, etc.)?
Do the citations and references follow APA formatting?

Note that these are some of the things you should be thinking about when doing your review.

You should NOT use this as a checklist and simply answer “yes/no” for each of the questions.

Instead, use the comments feature in Word to make notes directly on the paper. Think about each of these questions, and apply them directly to your peer’s paper when you see one that is applicable (i.e. an area of the paper that needs improvement). And, of course, don’t forget to include positive comments about the areas of the report that you like!

Finally, it’s important to keep in mind that the goal of this exercise is to help each other improve your writing. So, don’t feel timid about pointing out things that might be improved—a review that contains nothing but positive comments isn’t really very helpful. Also, be sure not to take any feedback personally—after all, we are only evaluating the writing itself, not the person! Sometimes we do feel shy about giving or getting feedback when it comes to writing, but like anything, the only way to get better is to first understand what needs improving, and that’s where this sort of exercise can really help.

[Order Now]

Peer Review assignment Instructions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.