Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Within different industries, white papers are used to propose a solution to a problem. Their focus usually begins with a big-picture view of an issue’s context and then lead readers to a specific proposal for a solution.
Normally, the audience for a white paper can be to persuade members of a business to change, alter, or adopt some new procedure. However, white papers can also be addressed to an industry or multiple companies within a field to address common problems by offering a solution. It is important that you consider who your audience is and what your audience needs to focus on. Otherwise, your white paper may not be read. It is important to use audience analysis in order to understand your reader’s concerns and emphasize the reader benefits of your solution, rather than focusing on your own interests, opinions, or needs.
For this assignment, you will first identify and describe a current or anticipated problem in a business or industry in which you have worked in the past, or a business or industry you hope to join after graduation. You will then propose a thoughtful, persuasive solution to that problem. You will present the problem and solution in the form of a white paper.
Your white paper should be 3-5 double-spaced pages (minimum of 3 full pages) with 12-point font and 1-inch margins. The works cited page does not count toward the length requirement. You should organize your white paper carefully and use clear, specific headings so that busy readers can scan the document effectively. The white paper is worth 30 points towards your final grade.
Consider and list of three business problems, one of which you will select as the topic for your white paper.
Sample topics:
Note: You may not use the sample topics provided in this assignment sheet for your own white paper.
After creating your list, you should do some preliminary research on each problem in order to determine what kinds of sources are available. Based on your preliminary research, select the problem you feel you will be able to write about most successfully.
Your white paper must contain all of the following parts:
After stating the problem, you need to provide background information about it to help readers make their decision based on a clear understanding of the facts. You also need to demonstrate your own expertise on the subject so that readers will perceive your solution as credible. Explain what is known about the problem and what caused it. Explain the consequences of the problem. Describe what is likely to happen if nothing is done. Describe previous attempts to solve the problem and explain why they were not successful.
Specific evidence is very important in this section, and you will need to do research. If you haven’t actually worked for the business or industry you are writing about, you will need to do the background research necessary to identify a current or anticipated problem, and then to pose a sound solution. Even if you are or have been employed at the business or industry in question, you will need to demonstrate a familiarity with the details, statistics, data, etc. that are relevant to your argument. Provide examples of the problem’s negative impacts. When possible, use numbers, statistics, and/or concrete facts: How much revenue has been lost? How many work hours have been wasted? How have public relations been damaged? How has customer satisfaction been decreased? Make sure to properly cite your sources for this information using MLA or APA in-text citations. Also, make sure your evidence is appropriate to your argument—don’t identify a problem that you witnessed once at a single McDonald’s restaurant and try to claim that it is a problem that constantly plagues the entire fast food industry (unless you have concrete facts to support such a claim).
Grading/Assessment (Value: 30 pts.)
I will grade your paper according to both mechanics and content. I’ll ask myself some of the following questions: Is the paper well-organized, well-formatted, and easy to navigate? Does the author demonstrate a clear understanding of the business or industry and its needs? Does the author demonstrate a clear understanding of the problem and its context? Is the solution reasonable and persuasive? Does the author support his/her claims with sensible reasons and valuable evidence? Is the writing clear of grammatical problems and spelling errors? Are the sources credible and cited clearly in the text? Is the works cited page complete, accurate, and properly formatted?
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/