Pop culture: The virus

December 21, 2022

Pop culture: The virus

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Pop culture: The virus

[Order Now]

Type:Essay (any type)

Service:Writing

Pages:11 pages / 3025 words

Level:College

Language:English (US)

Topic:Pop culture: The virus

Subject:English

Sources:7 sources required

Style:MLA

Description

Basic Structure/Layout of the Paper

Introduction [1 paragraph]

Thesis [1, maybe two sentences]

Background paragraph which explains only the most essential of the background, history, terms, concepts, or the like of this topic. [1-2 paragraphs; some research]

Describe the text’s denotation—what it appears to be, represent, or say on the surface. [1-3 paragraphs]

Put this text in conversation with comparable things. Highlight similarities and differences. [3-5 paragraphs; some research]

Analyzing superheroes? What are some others your chosen hero is like or unlike in some notable way? Analyzing drinks? What are some others yours is like or unlike in some notable way?

Establish a framework for oppositional reading—a lens through which you will examine it. This is often historical and political in nature. (research-heavy) Explain or offer up your oppositional reading of the text (the connotation). [bulk of the paper’s body; research as support as needed]

Either sign-by-sign adding up to the overall interpretation OR Overall interpretation to sign by sign Conclusion [1 paragraph]

AND I have 7 sources already.

Work cited Barry, John M. The Great Influenza:

the Story of the Deadliest Pandemic in History. Penguin Books, 2018.

Moalem, Sharon, and Jonathan Prince.

Survival of the Sickest: the Surprising Connections between Disease and Longevity. Harper Perennial, 2008.

Saluzzo Jean-François. La Saga Des Vaccins: Contre Les Virus. Belin-Pour La Science, 2011.

Sue Tong, sammi Zheng. “Briefing: More than 2,100 deaths in the United States; young Chinese awakened in the epidemic.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 29 Mar. 2020, cn.nytimes.com/morning-brief/20200329/coronavirus-briefing/ Holmes, Lindsay.

“These Are The Most Common Symptoms Of COVID-19 Right Now.” Yahoo!, Yahoo!,26June2020, www.yahoo.com/huffpost/most-common-covid-19-symptoms-195950075.html.

Staff, KOMU 8 Digital. “Friday COVID-19 Coverage: Columbia Mayor Calls for Mask Ordinance.” KOMU.com, www.komu.com/news/friday-covid-19-coverage-columbia-mayor-calls-for-mask-ordinance/. Yahoo!, Yahoo!, 23 June 2020, www.yahoo.com/entertainment/7-old-boy-reads-books-154320521.html.

Pop culture: The virus

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.