writing an argument and research techniques

December 21, 2022

writing an argument and research techniques

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descrwriting an argument and research techniquesptions

[Order Now]

Description

Task: The “chapter 7” reading talks about writing an argument and the “chapter 11” reading talks about research techniques. This essay asks you to practice those skills while simultaneously writing about something you know well (and hopefully enjoy talking about). Pick a topic that you consider yourself an expert in. For example, if you play a sport on campus you could write about playing that sport in college. You could also write about any hobbies you have or skills you’ve acquired. Your paper must include at least two outside sources and must make a definite argument. Be sure to pick types of sources that are relevant to your subject. Also, be sure to cite your sources carefully.

Examples/Topic ideas

If you’re a student athlete: You could look up information on whether people continue to play your sport after college and argue that it is or isn’t a good sport to play in college for those wanting to pick up a lifetime practice. Or you could look up information on injury rates and argue whether or not it’s worth playing at the college level. Or you could look up graduation rates and grades, etc. Note: Do not write about CTE in football. That topic has been done too many times in the recent past and it would be difficult to avoid accidental plagiarism with it. :

If you’re into cooking or baking: You could investigate the benefits of learning to cook or bake young. Or you could investigate the health benefits of cooking at home instead of eating out every day and argue about that, etc. If you’re into yoga or running: You could argue about the health benefits or about the best practices for different people, etc.

If you’re into shopping: You could research or argue about the way shopping practices have changed with the rise of internet shopping. Or you could research and explain how to find the best deals on specific types of things, etc.

In short, you’re welcome to pick any subject that you are familiar with, provided that you make a definite argument and include at least 2 appropriate sources. That said, I suggest that, as with the proposal paper, you stick to “local’, narrow topics and avoid taking on huge national or international issues.

[Order Now]

writing an argument and research techniques

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.