Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Writing Antigone and Kreon Essay
Type:Essay (any type)
Description
Examining Antigone and Kreon, explain which of the two characters deserves more sympathy and why. In your essay, you will need to make a case for the righteousness of one character over the other and use evidence from the play to support your rationale.
This should be argued as a lawyer making a case for a defendant- do not use first person singular in this essay. Take an evidence based approach using the outline below to make your case. Supporting evidence for your essay thesis should come only from the BLONDELL translation of the book. Do not use any other translations other than the Blondell translation as specified in the syllabus. OUTLINE: Outline for Essay
A. Your Main Claim/Thesis Statement (State in three to five sentences what is your main claim about Antigone and Kreon)
B. Claim about the Character of Antigone (what is the claim that you will be making about Antigone?)
a. Proof/Point 1 (State proof/point 1 and cite passages to support proof/point 1)
b. Proof/Point 2 (State proof/point and cite passages to support proof/point 2)
c. Proof/Point 3 (if necessary)
C. Claim about the Character of Kreon (what is the claim that you will be making about Kreon?)
a. Proof/Point 1 (State proof/point 1 and cite passages to support proof/point 1)
b. Proof/Point 2 (State proof/point and cite passages to support proof/point 2)
c. Proof/Point 3 (if necessary)
D. Conclusion (State in two to four sentences what is significant about your findings regarding Antigone and Kreon)
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/