Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Type:Critical Thinking / Review
Description
For your QCCs (Question, Comment, Connection) assignments, write between 1-3 paragraphs on any of the content in Modules 2 and 3. If you are answering the question or repeating the words of another student in the course (or indeed ANY source, from the internet or otherwise) you MUST provide the name of the student you are quoting or addressing to answer their question, or reference the source you’re quoting or paraphrasing. You will begin your post with a Question prompted by the readings.
This can be a question you have about the readings, or an open question you’d like the class to discuss pertaining to the readings and/or videos. You will then make a Comment on what you’ve seen of the ideas or concepts in the readings and/or film in your everyday life, or in society overall (including in other media.) You may also use this space to answer a question that another student has posted.
Finally, you will make a Connection between the various readings and/or films (and its concepts) for the present week, and/or between the present week and another week. https://fiu.kanopy.com/video/playing-unfair-media-image-female-athlete https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUxnBZxsfoU
Grading Rubrics
Writing Gender Critical Thinking / Review
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/or
Writing Gender Critical Thinking / Review