SORROWFUL WOMAN, and REDEPLOYMENT Annotated Bibliography

December 20, 2022

SORROWFUL WOMAN, and REDEPLOYMENT Annotated Bibliography

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

SORROWFUL WOMAN, and REDEPLOYMENT Annotated Bibliography

[Order Now]

Question Description

An Annotated Bibliography is a list of citations to books, articles, and documents. Each citation is followed by a brief (usually about 200 words) descriptive and evaluative paragraph—this is known as the annotation. The purpose of each annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the source cited. Your assignment: Develop an Annotated Bibliography using at least THREE relevant sources from the GMC Library. Remember that you are writing a paper on literature, so while you may find a historical document important to your research if you are performing a Historical Analysis, your sources should generally come from the Literary Resource Center in the GMC Library. Your bibliography will come in two parts:

1. A 100 word (or more) discussion on a text (or texts) from the course, and the critical perspective you plan to use in order to create a strong, detailed, analytical thesis statement.

2. 3-5 MLA Citations, with 200 word annotations for each (annotations include the following elements): a. Initial Appraisal b. Content Analysis First, you will write 100+ words explaining the text(s) you’ve chosen to analyze and why, as well as the critical perspective you intend to use.

3. While choosing your text or texts, pick one of the following options below…

• A topic focusing on one of the texts from class (if only writing on one text, try to focus on a different work than the ones you wrote on for Response Papers 1 and 2 unless getting my approval first).

• A topic focusing on multiple texts (no more than 3) by the same author

• A topic focusing on multiple texts (but no more than two) by different authors Then, you will write your annotated bibliography.

For the citation for each source, carefully follow the MLA format provided by the Purdue Owl. For each source annotation, be sure to read the materials in week 5’s Online Learning Resources for help with bibliographies and annotations.

The annotations will consist of the following: a. Initial Appraisal (50-75 words) You may address things like: What are the author’s credentials, educational background, or experience? Is the source current or out-of-date for your topic? Is the writing affiliated with any academic institutions, corporations, organizations, etc?

Content Analysis (150-200 words) You will ANALYZE the source, asking questions like: How is this work relevant to your chosen text? What is a particularly strong quote from this source? Why would it be helpful to your thesis idea? Does the source related to the critical perspective you’ve chosen? Specifically, your analysis should address the portions of the source that relate directly to what you are discussing; you don’t need to speak to the entire document unless all of it is relevant to your claim. As with all your submissions, this is a formal assignment that should be submitted using MLA format for style, spacing, heading, pagination, etc. Since you will be submitting a working thesis statement, a (minimum) 100-word discussion of that idea, and (minimum) 200-word annotations for at least three (and no more than five) sources, this submission should be at least 700-1200 words.

TEXT TOPICS ARE REVELATIONS, a SORROWFUL WOMAN, and REDEPLOYMENT

https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Mrs-Turpin-in-Flannery-OConnors-Revelation-FKJAPGZZVC

[Order Now]

SORROWFUL WOMAN, and REDEPLOYMENT Annotated Bibliography

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.