Employee Rewards and Recognition Essay

December 19, 2022

Employee Rewards and Recognition Essay
Overview
As an HR manager in a large health care organization, you have developed a new reward and recognition program designed to help increase employee motivation and job satisfaction in a specific hospital department of your choice. You may choose either a clinical or non-clinical department.

Instructions: based on the course readings and a minimum of four appropriate sources of research, create a 4–? 6 page executive summary suitable for presentation to senior leadership on employee motivation that includes the following:

Determine which department is suitable for the reward and recognition program.

Identify a specific goal the employees must work on to be eligible for recognition or to receive the award.

Examples include reducing errors, increasing customer or patient satisfaction, reducing costs.

Research a specific motivation theory and determine why this method would be the most practical and effective for this program.

Theories such as the expectancy theory, equity theory, goal-setting theory, Management by Objectives (MBO), or the four-prong model of intrinsic motivation.

Explain why the selected theory would be the most practical and effective for the rewards and recognition program.

Recommend 2–?3 types of rewards and (or) recognition that would be the most effective in motivating the employees to achieve the goals.

Create a communication tool for eligible employees announcing the program, rules, and awards.

For example, email, newsletter, internal Facebook post.

Employee Rewards and Recognition Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.