Russell s Appearance to Reality Questions

December 17, 2022

Description
Answer these nine questions about Russell’s Appearance to Reality: Here is the link to the reading http://www.ditext.com/russell/rus1.html
1. What are two of the things we believe in our daily lives that can be doubted (according to what Russell says in the second paragraph)?
2. What reason does Russell give for doubting that we know the real color of a table?
3. What is the difference between what a painter wants to know and what a philosopher wants to know?
4. What reason does Russell give for doubting that we know the real texture of a table?
5. What reason does Russell give for doubting that we know the real shape of a table?
6. What is the difference between sense data and a physical object (matter)?
7. What did the philosopher Berkeley believe about matter? Philosophers who agree with Berkeley are called what?
8. According to Russell, what do our five senses enable us to know immediately? What is it that we cannot immediately know by using our five senses?
9. What value does philosophy have, according to what Russell says in the last paragraph?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.