Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Financial Analysis Report Project
Financial, Analysis, Report, Project
Make sure that you label each part clearly and that you complete all parts (a-h). The qualitative parts of your paper should be at least 2100 words. The most important part of your paper is the final recommendation (part h) which should be supported by the discussion of key statistics such as ratios, market value, beta, and diluted EPS and the forecast of several key variables (parts e and f).
You grade will be mostly determined by your performance on these sections. Use interior titles to separate your work. Present your financial statements as an appendix. Include a reference page of at least 6 references in APA style.
The research paper assignment is worth 140 points of the course grade.
The objectives/purpose of the research paper project are to enable you to do a comprehensive financial analysis of a publicly traded corporation; and provide you with substantial information for you to make recommendations regarding investing in this corporation.
Your financial analysis report will be driven by a rigorous ratio analysis, and aggressively supplemented with your written analysis, interpretation, and evaluation of the data.
Your research should be strategically driven by two probing questions:
-Would you invest your financial capital in the selected firm as a shareholder?
-Would you invest your human and intellectual capital in the firm as an employee?
Steps in preparation of financial analysis report:
Financial diagnostic categories
Chosen company vs.
Benchmark competitor
1.) Liquidity of short-term assets
-Current ratio
-Cash ratio
-Quick ratio
-Current ratio
-Cash ratio
-Quick ratio
2.) Long-term debt-paying ability
-Debt ratio
-Debt-equity ratio
-Times interest earned
-Debt ratio
-Debt-equity ratio
-Times interest earned
3.) Profitability
-Net income/sales (profit margin)
-Net income/assets (ROA)
-Net income/shareholder equity (ROE)
-Net income/sales (profit margin)
-Net income/assets (ROA)
-Net income/shareholder equity (ROE)
4.) Asset utilization/ management efficiency
-Total asset turnover
-Inventory turnover measures
-Accounts receivable turnover
-Total asset turnover
-Inventory turnover measures
-Accounts receivable turnover
5.) Market measures
-Price/earnings ratio
-Earnings per common share
-Dividend payout
-Price/earnings ratio
-Earnings per common share
-Dividend payout
Use 2-3 ratios per diagnostic category. Place your ratio calculations in the table for your selected companies—primary company and benchmark competitor. Using 5 diagnostic categories, and 3 ratios to assess each category, results in 15 ratio measures per company that will be compared side by side.
This means that every table that you cut and pasted or typed from the web must have a source at the bottom of the table AND that citing must also be included in a reference page at the end of the report.
The parts of the research paper are discussed below. The completed report (parts a through h) is due day 7 of week 7. Your project should include:
iii. Present your results following the five types of ratios discussed in part d.
iii. You need to say specifically what the forecasted value of the stock price is.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/