Exposure to Different Forms of Diversity

Exposure to Different Forms of Diversity

Instructions/Descriptions

Exposure to Different Forms of Diversity

Exposure, Different, Forms, Diversity

[Order Now]

Identify your earliest exposure to people who were racially or culturally different from you through movies, television shows, or music.

• What was your age?
• Who was the person and how was he or she different?
• What impressions did you have about these people from these media?
• From a cultural pluralist’s perspective, do you think this experience was positive or negative for you?

See rubric for specific grading criteria.

Name: Reflection Essay Grading Rubric

• Grid View
• List View

Introduction needs to be more detailed and should end with a strong thesis statement (central argument).

Your introduction is missing a thesis statement – Generally the thesis statement is placed as the last sentence in the introductory paragraph. The thesis statement should give the central argument for the paper. This sentence does not do that. Please read here about formulating a thesis statement: http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/thesis-statements/

A thesis statement should be one sentence in length and should give the main argument that your paper will “prove” in its course.

You need to give YOUR position as the thesis statement for your papers. The introduction should introduce the topic, then give both sides of the issue, and lastly give your thesis (your position) and the argument your paper will prove. Does that make sense?

“Cultural context section needs to include each of these subsections and each should be clearly labeled:

Represented in US

Individualistic/Collective

ASSIGNMENT 2 – CASE STUDY

There are three (3) questions worth 10 marks each.

NT Gold Resources Ltd (“company”) was incorporated on 1 January 2018 and was listed on the Australian Stock Exchange in March 2018, having raised $20 million from public investors.

The company was primarily involved in mining exploration activities in the Northern Territory. The company has three directors, Vincent, Steve and Paul. Vincent is the company’s chief executive officer. Steve is the chairman of the company. Paul is the director and company secretary. The management team also includes Jack who is the company’s chief financial officer.

The company began exploration activities in April 2018. After drilling a number of potential mining sites, a geological survey was commissioned, and the samples of the mineral extracts were tested. The results from the test indicated that the mining sites had extremely low levels of gold deposits that were considered to be uncommercial. The company had by then already spent $5 million.

At a board meeting in January 2019, the directors considered whether to abandon its mining activities and return the company’s remaining capital back to its shareholders. Vincent is optimistic and over-confident and wants to pursue the exploration project in the Northern Territory.

He argued that the company could be on the verge of a major discovery and should continue with its exploration activities. Steve and Jack were less optimistic and suggested they cease exploration given the test results and return all the remaining capital to the company shareholders. To avoid another confrontation with Vincent, they agreed with him that the company would continue with its drilling program.

At the end of 2019, the drilling activities were completed and all of the company’s capital has been exhausted without any material mineral discoveries. The shareholders are annoyed and upset amount losing all their investments.

Required:

1. Have Vincent, Jack and Steve breached any directors’ duties? (10 marks)
2. Do they have an arguable defense? (10 marks)
3. Advise whether the same standard will be applied to Jack, as the company’s chief financial officer? (10 marks)

Assessment Rubric

LAW205 – Commercial and Corporate Law for Accountants

Assessment 2: Case study (Problem-solving task)

The aim of this assignment is for the student to identify the legal issues arising from the scenario given. Whereas Assignment No. 1 had a strong

focus on your ability to conduct legal research, the focus of this assignment is to conduct some basic legal research but, more importantly, to articulate the issues, apply the law and express a conclusion as to the possible outcomes in clear, plain English. Therefore, higher weighting will be given to analysis and application components.

Criteria (total mark is out of 30)

High Distinction 85 – 100%

Distinction 75 – 84%

Credit 65 – 74%

Pass 50 – 65%

Fail <50%

Identification of legal issues and relevant law, including accessing and summarising resources and legal sources ( /12)

Identification of all relevant issues and law. Demonstrates skilful use of high quality, credible, relevant sources. Selection of sources goes well beyond the prescribed textbook. An excellent summary of relevant information.

Identification of most issues and relevant law. Demonstrates selection of credible, relevant sources from relevant, quality literature/sources. Accurate summary of relevant information

Identification of key issues and questions of law. Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources. Information is gathered from good range of electronic and non-electronic sources but could have been extended. Summary of information could be improved.

Identification of few or basic issues and relevant law. Attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources. Information is gathered from a limited range of electronic and non-electronic sources. Some capacity to summarise information.

Failure to identify basic or fundamental issues and relevant law. Very limited range of sources utilised. Unable to demonstrate ability to summarise information.

Analysis and Application (/12)

Excellent ability to appraise evidence, evaluate arguments and to formulate and express very sound conclusions. Extensive analysis of options available and their relevance to the case in point. An excellent application of interpretation rules and steps of procedural analysis and clearly articulated arguments which provided a strong framework.

Good demonstration of the capacity to critically analyse information, formulate own conclusions and express own ideas. A good analysis of options available and their relevance to the case in point. Very good application of the appropriate interpretation rules and steps of procedural analysis.

Reasonable analysis of information. Demonstrated ability to draw warranted conclusions and generalisations and demonstrates some original thought. A reasonable attempt to analyse options available and their relevance to the case in point but analysis requires more depth. Appropriate interpretation rules and steps of procedural analysis identified and a reasonable attempt to apply to case study.

Limited ability to interpret data, appraise evidence or evaluate arguments. Conclusions need improvement and need to express own ideas. Some attempt at analysis of options available and their relevance to the case in point. Explores a few dimensions but lacks depth. Some reference to interpretation rules and procedural analysis steps required but not adequately applied to the task.

Little or no critical analysis or interpretation of information, poor conclusions and no original thought. Limited analysis of options available and their relevance to the case in point. Mainly descriptive report. Limited or no reference to interpretation rules and procedural analysis steps required.

Synthesis (/ 6)

• Structure • Logic • Presentation

Well-constructed assignment: appropriate, clear, and smooth transitions; arrangement of organisational elements is particularly apt; uses sophisticated legal wording in sentences effectively; usually chooses words aptly; observes professional conventions of written English and report format; free of spelling, grammatical, punctuation and typing errors.

Well written and presented assignment: distinct units of thought in paragraphs; clear transitions between developed, coherent, and logically arranged paragraphs; a few mechanical difficulties or stylistic problems; may make occasional problematic word choices or syntax errors; a few spelling or punctuation errors or a cliché; uses appropriate formal report format

Reasonably written and presented; some awkward transitions; some brief, weakly unified or undeveloped paragraphs; arrangement may not appear entirely natural; contains extraneous information, more frequent wordiness; unclear or awkward sentences; imprecise use of words or over- reliance on passive voice; some distracting grammatical errors; some spelling, punctuation and typing errors.

Not consistently or logically structured: Narrates/ digresses from one topic to another; awkward use of words, numerous errors in style & presentation including spelling punctuation and grammar. Not comfortable with a formal style of written communication.

Simplistic, tends to narrate or merely summarise. Illogical arrangement of ideas & some major grammatical or proofreading errors. Language frequently weakened by clichés, colloquialisms, and repeated inexact word choices. Unaware of how to present formal written communication.

[Order Now]

Exposure to Different Forms of Diversity

Exposure to Different Forms of Diversity

Exposure to Different Forms of Diversity

Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!