Answering Discussion Questions Assignment

December 7, 2022

Answering Discussion Questions Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Answering Discussion Questions Assignment

[Order Now]

Week 5 discussion

Before beginning work on this week’s discussion forum, please review the link “doing discussion questions right,” the expanded grading rubric for the forum and any specific instructions for this week’s topic.

The discussion assignment consists of two parts. Select one of the questions for part 1 and answer part 2.

By the due date assigned, submit your answers to part 1 and part 2 to this discussion area. Post the answers to both parts in one thread.

Label your answers part 1 and part 2, but do not repeat the scenario text in your responses. Start reviewing and responding to your classmates as early in the week as possible. You should review and critique the work of other students as outlined in the expanded rubric by the end of the week.

Discussion question part 1

Select one of the scenarios listed below and explain the best solution for each. Include comments related to any ethical issues that arise. You should locate at least one scholarly source from the suo library or one case that has been decided or is currently pending to support your answer.

Scenario 1 – discrimination

The mad beach pub is a small casual restaurant located in your state. The business is privately owned and currently has 4 full time employees and 15 part time employees. Mandie, a 46 year old transgender applicant for a position as a bartender was denied the position.

Mandie was highly qualified, with many years of experience in waitressing and bartending; however, joy, a 25 year old college student was hired. Joy’s experience included working as a waitress at hooters for 1 year.
Research the state laws on non-discrimination in your state.

Using federal law and your state law, discuss the probable outcome of a discrimination lawsuit based on transgender.

Using federal law and your state law, discuss the probable outcome of a lawsuit based on age discrimination

Scenario 2 – agents

Dennis and donna smith owned a 10-acre tract of land that they decided to sell. The couple entered into a listing agreement with kelly mclaughlin, a licensed real estate broker. The agreement gave kelly the exclusive right to sell the property for a period of 6 months.

The smiths agreed to pay kelly a 6% commission of the selling price if a buyer was found during the listing period. Four months later, the smiths sent kelly a letter terminating the listing agreement.

Kelly did not approve of the conditions. One month later, kelly presented a full price offer to the smiths; however, they ignored the offer and sold the property to another buyer. Kelly sued the smiths for breach of the agency agreement.

Which party wins the lawsuit?

Did the smiths act ethically in this case?

Scenario 3 – agency and liability for agents

Greg hired drake’s renovations to remodel his kitchen and one bathroom for $15,000. Drake was required to follow the plans and instructions provided by greg and complete the work by rooms by june 30.

Drake had the exclusive right to control the manner and method for performing the work, including the right to select other workers and tools used. One day, two of drake’s employees were unloading a spa tub for greg’s bathroom. Startled by a noise, the employee turned quickly and the tub struck sandy, who was walking her dog. Sandy tripped and hit her head on the pavement. The dog broke loose, bit drake’s employee, and then ran off.

Explain the relationship between greg and drake’s renovations. What are the rights and responsibilities of each party?

Which party is liable for sandy’s injuries?

Which party is liable for the injuries to the employee?

Discussion question part ii

Select two of the topics from the list. Provide information about how your new company ( coffee kettle) will handle the topics selected.

Employment discrimination

Independent contractors

Negligent hiring

Union organization

Drug testing

Electronic monitoring of company-owned computers, cell phones and/or vehicles

Employee use of social media

Answering Discussion Questions Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.