Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Throughout this course, you have been working with a hypothetical project for the Lucky Me Animal Rescue’s annual adoption event. You have focused on the specific phases, tasks, and processes of project management.
In this unit, we have reinforced that ethical standards and professional conduct are critical throughout each step of the project.
For this assignment, you will write a reflection paper in which you will address the prompts below.
Your reflection paper must be a minimum of two pages in length, not counting the title page. External sources and APA formatting are not required for this reflection paper.
Resources
Previous Assignment Scenario
Lucky Me Animal Rescue Strategy Map
The Lucky Me Animal rescue adoption project will involve several teams taking part in different activities. The project aim is to increase the animals’ adoption rates. This objective has minor objectives which include providing home to as many animals as possible and getting the right people to adopt the animals.
The project has a two-month timeline and also aims at minimizing the cost of the process through utilizing volunteers from the local community. The project will be managed by a project manager who will oversee all the activities are done right and on time.
This means that the balanced matrix organizational structure will be adopted. The project manager has partial authority and a full-time role. The team leaders will report to project manager. The project will have the project manager and the team leaders form the work breakdown structure and write down the activities which include:
grooming the animals one week before the event, taking pictures of all the animals available for adoption and posting them, arranging the adoption venue, promoting the event through the local community, conducting the adoption process.
Project Manager’s Role
The project manager’s role is one of the most critical leadership roles of a project team. The project manager will evaluate and analyze the project prior to the initiation (Project Management Institute, 2017). The project manager will develop the schedule for the project together with the expected budget using the work breakdown activities.
The project schedule is one communication method where each team will be required to do their activities within the planned time.
Project Communication
The project schedule will be communicated to the teams through telephone calls and emails. Each team will have a leader who will ensure the team is timely and effectively completing each task. The other communication method to be adopted is the live meeting which will be done at the team level involving the team leader and the specific team.
This meeting will be done daily to discuss the tasks progress, challenges experienced and any changes required (Daim, Et Al., 2012). Live meeting will also be conducted weekly between the project manager, the Lucky Me animal rescue management and the team leaders. This is to access the progress of the project, to identify and discuss arising challenges and develop solutions and also to discuss changes and any required improvements.
Organizational Structure
The organizational structure of balanced matrix allows the project to have a central control system where authority flows from the project manager to the team leaders and then to the team members as explained by Sy, Beach & D’Annunzio, (2005).
The project manager and the team leaders oversee all the activities and are responsible for ensuring that all the tasks get the required resources on time. The matrix organizational structure allows the team members to work in areas of expertise rather than working on various tasks.
This applies to resources where they are used across projects maximizing their use. This shows that the organizational structure chosen is economical and effective for the project as it intends to use the minimum resources.
The employee answers to different team leaders making resolving of issues more quickly rather than the project manager dealing with all the challenges that develop. The other advantage is multiple tasks can be done as different team with different leader works on different tasks. This eliminates the problem of tasks duplication as each team has its own tasks different from the other.
The balanced matric organizational structure also provides ease monitoring of project progress and control measure can be easily adopted to correct in case of lagging behind in terms of time. This makes the project to be completed on time.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/